Show l T I BI BILL Measure to Allow pre e ti of fl Assessment AssessmentS Assess ments 0 Disa ad adS ii S OPPOSED TO PROGRESS ELLS EL TAXES TAKES THIS THREE ACTS BIGI I IH r 4 H IT H M Yea Yeat yesterday t l 1 1 H bill H fL B U Us UI I gly Y haJt l abutting property rODert owners owner tT to M tnt t nt an improvement be IliuM tiui j affixed his hili hIre b bK uki K hili Y v s lator Barber revising ih bh il ld ame law la requiring a 11 u iC r oe be oem h m t 1 to tom toT tour T ur ar m in u the state tate limiting limit the thel ner c cal l i that can be hO killed each al r 1 to tt t t hut urk tuk k with horse horns and Del ex ext exi n If t tf h i en season for few the tile hunt aunt huntz r z 0 f 11 ll i K IS to allow from fromI 1 r n h I t tU Manh 15 j I U H IL h hy by Representative Spry Ilig g i statutes relative to the ma ins main I IZ up at t Provo Prove and i gIlg lC name flume nane to state te mental taI hoe bos ho hoi Ii i B fl B 1 11 i giving the board boar of edu edn i pour to grant grauL rant te temporary ceres certo 1 es t to t lathe oat hers Text of Veto X T rea relUr ri r ascribed hy by hyU hyner Governor rl in j do nir Hamlins Banal U bUt bill are arey i y et ruth Irth r tt h in the following let letI I he h sent nt to Secretary of ofHa ofHa Id Ha Hak shortly before t tv Uk k Ian laM v cuing The letter lefter of veto Teto d s ag a 1 I II 0 s March JI 1 Sec Sc i ry of State dt e th tb i i im or to file tUe with you y U u with BJ mx r UPI aPI t 1 I not hut with a statement of e l je j tt ti I required by Kw Pw W house boue U I No j 1 t a a in III II ut to amend Action m 1 r rt i i J statute of Utah Uta UM uN eon con O i Ig n t r intention Int n to levy IOV local Lu m III dUt ties as aa amended a by byr byi i IT r 13 11 t ii tl laws aws la of Utah MO 1901 hilt Ml U on r i t t of it f the approval of this r i i i t I to LO restore the provi provit of t tl I laws Ia of O 1918 1 as U to toi torn i iI ir rn n f property ownership re it rei itI i 1 I id t t I h successful objection Y p POH I atel e p r to meats menta mother another effect 11 l t lit ilu r rant ruit to city councils the theto VI 4 to U r dr i r t rUin improvements Improvement ut th tn of an any ny successful M sl or Jr i non whatsoever The Ther r i l rr r to which bleb this tb bill bUI billI 11 I rL U wa 1 m in substance that ob obIn In til 11 t l I th owners ownen of r ty would constitute t ppe i the I h levy of ot a tax for the v me i ir ed As Aa amended mead 4 by byi bylaw i law Lt tw w r tn ii the tae I Ie percentage of ob oh n K g pro t was increased t in lii neither law la however i i l pr r tut tI I to I Li city councils a to or t r i in i extensions r r i repairs 11 v for tor which the prop own I ri n to 10 be taxed without K It thoi t hi in y opportunity for effective Km Rn a Ii 1 i The entire sweeping apin away aay l is rigl r I protest I regard a IU a aJ se lif J n II to II the proposed bill even rit rity to a hearing bearing t I u I r t band hand while reluctant to toI th tho I h a generally speaking of ung i 1 L minority the power to toI th lung I anion action of a majority f Ixl xi law permits in this mat att t pr r 11 I that no argument ia is Dec M to 10 w that se far as proper n p I and perhaps in uh lh 1 hi the general wel el ela a u 1 1 ties of ot the occasion RO tu t where h the rep t I I e i Ih he ie majority have decided im uh I h ii try y exists exist No form o oi oIn oj i In i i j u ir i I with the majority i Jf It r K ner purposes ell H ee ec Il d r jE me IDe meL L oj ual rung trong t I reaO IU rt a apro 1 pro 1111 fl for t f r special epee eci th it i i rt to be taxed will re it dl 11 t nul lId tangible ta benefit par Mr parm 1 m in fl t 1 M as 5 above ab e suggested th rs representatives d i It to be advisable I i Kight Be B Stopped stapp if lL I that if section is of I VH 1 b I ja Ir of f 1198 had bad not been i h tin Ih l tas of ot 1901 many plen i nt it recently made m some t I udd U iI have hV been prevented c d i d i an Ul It may be considered i lr ro r i 1 that thal the approval of ot the J hi hI bil In restoring th the for fork td t k M repeals repeal th the later and more ul 11 I m n i will have ha a similar Jar ef Iut more I think it la Is at ep JI rt n t bat hat many of ot the objectors ob hn I n 1 in the th future presumably i k thi th I h who have bave acquired property n ui II I purposes purpose and are content contentI nt u i t t t f natural Increase in in values r J S h n willing thine to contribute ex en ext ent tl t I r patience to the enhance t values A baTe hare majority i i Lh lb b elements can ean easily ly but butt buth t i lv Iv h ind uld In the way Wy of public v MI IT f f this bill l should prevail t i i 11 I I n f it to o be our S duty to toN N 01 legislation 1 to 0 enable them themi i j o 6 face lac of ot successful expert n rt w A n I t I existing statute tak Where i if t f the residents elects tu tuam 1 am U nd a majority of the city cit ll n ii d I upon a Io special levy for tor fort torI t I it seems to me IDe meuth meS uth S t h existing provision for pro pre pret t II 11 i and desires of those legit leak I x ei 11 t 1 I to be he are sufficient af tc tf t t t I ro To permit a weaker protest mul l would therefore ap ap apt t tot b o only a concession l to t non DOn nonte kt u its te ai at a r peculators but also ateo a dl dI lo t 1 w t I the t he be progressive spirit t and andr r 1 em nt if f t the age a For these rea tea reat teaI t I I rive ve to the bill my approval r H M JI Governor |