Show SUSTAINED BY I HIGH COUNCIL I 0 Endorse Bishops Court in the I Case AN ALL NIGHT SESSION If EITOR W WILL TA TO TOI I I r m FE hig high cunel council ot of the Mormon 0 church spending almost an ii 1 hurel at almOt an 0 nl night t In a a l rehearing rr of the thet t gna se I l Editor Ott Otto Ry cr Charged ih arout ad anil sundry nr 0 the curc church and hl his brethren I the of the bishops 0 rt Il which te the o ease w was trie tried Rome re 0 ainee From 7 Wednesday p until 4 yesterday morn dl g U tt Rr ot of t the Se Swedes wu was In wordy btU battles and ands and 0 ta s a l frt had It band t to b until 0 Inc gw grew so leh lengthy for t was tas hr r It I I is said Id every er on one In the thea a 5 tice g see ex except t t the Swedish e ed edor or nn ani t the president o of th the counci council wt When Vb the evidence r alt In the counselors with ih sleepy al r telve away irons t and anum about two P r o nut tuta time a It Is said ld tn In arriving at atI at I 0 f ic 0 art asserts that h he w was no n new w evidence and tt that t It a a portion ot of the evidence In j at te the first trIal was A prent present 1 I Ii wu was allowed no privileges at atla la bre the curt court ot of tr trial h he at asserts J 1 rd h lv further delar declares that It is 18 his b f vf t tUt that te the council h bad It its verdict if up before ore It wet went Into alon session 0 rr rf sya 11 be ba baa ben been dOie denied justice and andt andr t r w V he to appl appeal the he ce case to tot tf t 0 stU still higher first preot 0 P C y ot of the church This wilL 1 b be done 1 ot of the action that wU will b be 0 1 rn by te the m mass meeting of Swee Swedes 0 t b be held In the theatre 0 of te the Case I The ht bearing 01 of the c case on t I t I I in the ot of Angus M MI I 1 the stake prent president Mr Can Tn ad and hl his tw two counselors ut sat as juges whIle the twelve high I ad ati as jurors Two counselors I f s re by the curt court 10 act on onI I c ft f Mr aD and lok look ater after F t two men men said Mr Ryman r 0 t t by me durIng the tho trial but neither I C thorn It time spoke Joko a a wor word to m me durn during the I When the c case ws was opened It wa was wasI I E that bu ot of the tac fact that 1 t hearing was on appel appeal only the 0 J nl at te the frt first trall trial t l i te bj bishops hops cort court could he be brought the higher ourt Then the rain tf ot the proceedings In the lower ort c rt were and rea read t to the I According to the statement I cf f Mr te the minutes did not nott anything like Uke th the ful full details t of at t th produced at te the tor for 0 rr trial but contained only such as had been mentioned In the thed C ti d o ll or of the lower court l hr Mr tr oter offered hiS bin minutes o t C t trial whIch he wa was a and OITt correct record ot of the theT T I 1 In the bishops court but 0 11 asserts that he w was not allowed to this account to te the council and its 8 not ant allowed to mke make al any state regarding anything m more re than thanh thanIn In h 19 s In th the Incomplete raIn Its frt first Ire presented nU 0 1 Defee Defense of Mr tr In melting his defense for tor abut about two hour hours arguing fat the the verdict of the lower curt court was 1 rc t in accordance wih with te the evidence In InI I t at al all but ha had ben been brought about through strong ad and unjust In inI I e directed against him him He a as 17 th that t the whole matter wa was but butan un an outgrowth ot of hi his contentions for tor a aJ a J 4 Swedish organization and trat there was a difference between tere wa a 1 th Swedish ad and Danish lagage languages As for tor the alleged ridicule ot of his tel w Swedes he denie denied tat that he had I d that declaring that 1 be had only onty tid the truth when he printe printed artcle articles abut some ot of t the Swedish brethren 0 were objected to by tho those breth t I ren renI I When Edior Editor who l is one 0 ot f the a accusers u r hd had hi his inning he It itIs f Is Jod said asserted tt that untruthful and andt t articles hat had been published him hirn In th the articles were the account of at an fight wih with an In his 0 1 office and d a scuffle fe wIth the 0 ther at the tabernacle In which Dahl Dahle m e aist 1 Rad to have ben been ete ejected from j the F te the other accuser 0 that Ryman hael hac crete created dis disS t I S r on among the Swedish people by byI I It I about the differences 11 ti languages He i It i is declared 1 n that wante wanted to b be the 0 1 sr hr of the Swe Sweden and hd bad cret created itu lUit trouble a was raa making a fight to r n organization In order to toI I ign n this end Replies to i In to t this Mr Kr atte stated that nut It if be e ba had M bust going abut about trying t to t get tho th pt ot of leadership anion anionS S Uk th he would have have gone about e I tn n a Hr ery different dUent way He stated I n order to 1 get a position ot of led lead t I e eh h If p In th the church a n man would have t I n rt different tactics from that ot of otc c 1 ss q lIng Ing out fearlessly what hat he 0 bu 0 ht and standing up for It it le lYe C uri 1 hat bitt he wate wanted afy any PUn position of oC ofa a and asserted rt that he be had a I for tor what W was rIght I eni t to nfl aU tue true S Sedes an and I It Wal r 1 my fr truth a and juU justice that b he heS S b j i mad a fight j Mr 1 went Oi on to say y that It if 1 1 a wrong t lo hi his brethren 1 uI uld gladly for tor I It but butI I hat bat hI wa was CD convinced J that he had don done 1 4 a tong rong and therefore woul would nt not notI t I tI T While Mr r was waa 1 II km if In his ba behalf oe one ot of the cun cunI coun I t ra he smarts spoke up and said saidI d I n 1 wn t do a any lo good for tor you to 1 mr more You I s r h b t La as wel 0 hi his M M top but 1 r p ng ngi rt Cannon toM op to continue i lna hi ha t talk abt about the e ease eased i d muon tt t for years el past t td d bad telling hi t n lydman w was publishing In hi his 0 f 0 h be that he be ha had hadem fI em to save v these 8 Up ua until l tH they 0 l itne e eD h t to take te the mt mat f the court J rf b bishops Curt 0 Thought Guit Guilty 0 Ur Mr Cannon stated said M Mr R I Ir 0 r that t the art spirit tt that I In n before the council showed that tor e t swe I i C r I H and that I reminded him himl tat rf a l 1 c of f tM th aptt apostates o of old who to creat divisIons and die Ir n In th the church le lie ad said that I my paper like the ma man who T rr 1 t tt td h his pigs o on ois onions To Tod it d 0 sprinkled Dp a a lot o of aples apples to toj 0 j 4 HI tI Ii pigs 1 so tt that the they wold would eat t 0 a as wl well before 4 a m in tM the arg argut t Fr r t wre cD an and te the council r d to agree up upon a verdict The They 0 ti lit In a mute or tw two an and an ani p I that the evidence warranted i evence in su tl t the verdict of te the I 1 1 ourt ud and that te the eItor editor must mUltI I p n t h apology prepared by te the lower lowert J tan t anI I it a as within t f day days fr front that date or on be beI I tU t from tu the Church I Mr N Immediately gave notice 9 that he would appeal appeal the matter to the first presidency of the church After I had baA given notice ot of appeal Mid saki Mr Mr Cannon tried to blurt bluff me out ot of doing It by stating slating that the matter could only pass In re review re revIew view before the first presidency and that it would have to come back to tie hl high h for tor reconsideration It if any were ordered As for tor the verdict ot of course I mIght have known that It would e be the same as AI In the lower court for tor I have no doubt that Angus M 31 Cannon wrote that verdict himself elt and of course he had to sustain his hI own verdict |