| Show FOURTEEN IN I Divorces Divorce Granted By Judge Riles Hiles Hie Yesterday 4 1 ALL WENT VENT 0 SAD TALE T L BELATED BY Y MINNIE 1 4 11 vir ea were w granted yes yesterday yesterday by Jud Hii HUes 0 There was no contest in hi any case cane C for the reason reas n that default of defendants had been previously entered etere for Tor 01 Hailing failing to to answer r the complaints tiled med against them The number of eases cases disposed of represent represented ed c an accumulation of about aboul two months moll and it i required only a short time tm te to go through the ex parte proof in support of or the te allegations There Thee were only two cases wherein the husband was WS the plaintiff The first of these the called caJe to the courts at attention attention tenton was wis that tbt of Henry Henr E Mon Monheim Monheim heim helm vs VB Ada Ad da Wilson Monheim The rho complaint t recited r that the parties partes to the suit sulf were married marIe at Brigham City on May M 17 Ii 1899 when the y 18 plaintiff was less leg then than 20 2 years year year old and his bride was ws many years his senior The cause cuse of action acton alleged alleg was wa that the wife wie persisted pris in living a life Ufe of shame in one of or the thE resorts resents on Commercial street in this city The defendant was not noton noton noton on hand to rebut the charge and after young oung Monheim testified in support of oft the he t allegations the court cO granted him hima a decree dere of f separation The The of George S Backman vs VB Den belt Backman came next It I was as shown that the couple were mar married marred ned ried red at Mammoth on May 5 1897 and that a little more than a year later his wife wie deserted him while he went with the Utah Uth batteries to help rout the Spaniards and an subdue the th Filipinos Mrs Backman Backma did no deny the th Charge ceny th and the husband got gt his decree Divorce For Clara Car Young A decree deree was granted to Clar Clara M MYoung 11 MYoung Young nee Mann Man from Ernest I 1 Young Yong on in t a showing that her husband had gone goue t to o the Philippine islands and that for re than two years past he had failed to provide for the support of herself hersl and little boy The couple were married in March 1892 The couple cuple are well wen known in this cRy city c y The only plaintiff in yesterdays di divorce divorce divorce vorce hearings herings who got any alimony almony awarded was Elizabeth Elzabeth Searle who in instituted instituted instituted suit sui against a John C Searle for fora a divorce on the allegation that for more than a year Yer past pst defendant had failed faie to provide for the family y sup support support port They Tey were married marrie twenty years ago The amount of the alimony almony was itis s decreed decree at 1000 lO payable pable at the rate of 20 a month On the witness wines stand Minnie McDon McDonald aid ald ld a strange tale of cruelty at the hands or oi her husband William McDonald cDonald She swore that in April Apri 1895 shortly shorty after the te marriage the de defendant defendant defendant falsely accused her of stealing his money mone and followed this indignity with calling her a 0 redheaded devil devi and ad other bad bd names names When she was sick she declared deel red her husband threat threatened thre threatened ened to carve caIe her hel into pieces and It rc pressed the hope that she would die She got goth her bar r decree On the thc grounds grund of desertion and hd 1 on support the e following were ere granted decrees de do decrees crees of divorce the defendant in each case being in default for failure to answer the complaints Matilda Hirsch vs YS Charles W VT T Hirsch Hirs Hlen A 4 Godske Godke sj Alexand F J J j G ci Baraby vs Charles Darnaby Emily Wilson vs Robert Hobert C Wilson Vison Annie Kruse vs Ferd TV T Kruse Krus Mary A Blaisdell Blaisel vs Willis Vils I Blaisdell Ellen Elen S Patterson Paterson vs Albert AlbertB B Patterson Nellie Nele Smith vs James JamesT T Smith Hilda Hida Lax La vs Carl J Lax Edith J Bevan Bevah vs Edward Bevan The case cam cas of Anna M Deal vs Elisha Elsh P o Deal was referred to T J 5 T Anderson to 10 take testimony and report A simi nimi similar sini lar order was 5 made in iii the case of Sarah SarahE E Heath vs Horace Horce A Heath the ref referee referee referee to be G E Blair |
