Show I SUPREME COURT 1 P m m m m w TO SETTLE SEIn PONT PONTI POINT I Whether Land Board May Let Lett II University Permanent Use Fund FundA Part Par of A d decision lm la Is i expected in the te near ne fu future f future ture in the case brought in ID the th state elt supreme court cur by the te regents reent of the University of Utah to test tet its ita il right to tous use us a portion of the permanent land ln fund of at the institution for the purpose pur of erecting a central building for the university The case was waa W brought against the state land board some time ago after alel the board bord had refused rt to ac sc accept a the note of the regents for a per por portion pr required and to ad advance advance tion of the te amount rull ad t immediate vance the sum needed nee for use u No small amount of interest is being bing i itken taken sl in the outcome of the ease case c not only by the tho university officials but by lawyers throughout the city ety The leg legislature legislature legislature at Its It last lat session passed an act authorizing the regents reent of p the tha in institution to expend a certain sum sm forthe for forthe forthe the erection ertin of the th central building but when the land ln board bard sought legal Jl ad advice a advice vice aa as to the possibility of complying vc with the request of the regents regent a snag n was w struck which made it i necessary to have a test case cane cas made I mae |