Show of ot holding the ball baU with wih one arm and using the tho other to ward off ot a kicker kicer kic er men held the ball baU tightly with wih two hands and when approached by b a tackier tackler stopped at every attempt to tackle tac le them It I worked to a great seat ad advantage adS vantage against tabs method of try tr ing to play pla football by b warding waring off or a tackler tackier with one hand and making yards arts alter after aCer being hit hi by an opposing tackler tackier which In nearly every eel case re resulted suited suled in a fumble Owing to the of ot gaining I on straight football and the difficulty In holding the ball bal neither heither r team t am could af ford to take chances chanc In playing straight football except when they were in their opponents opponent territory terr o As I h had the ball bail bal In territory a greater greatel part of or the tue time owing to luck In 11 the two kickoffs lR Idaho naturally could take chances on the te first two downs and did try tn to play pia straight football On the theother theother theother other hand band Utah Uth could not pot take these chances and its is only salvation was to kick on the first down don to keep the ball bali put of ot Its own territory Consequently Consequent Idaho tried a dozen first and nd second downs d ns during the game to one by b Utah Uth and naturally the yardage arage gained would be more mor But in spite of ot the fact that Idaho used two downs and a kick to one o e kick the ball bal only once went back of ot line Une for a n touch touchback touchback back which shows plainly that even Jn In Inthe n the kicking department Convill must have done some great set work In keeping the ball bal away awa from the goal goal line lne Penalties Favored F Idaho Another item m in favor tavor was penalties Utah Uta 1 being penalized three yards to one for tor the Moscow OSCO men From the foregoing It is I hard hr to t fig fiS f ure nrc where Idaho showed showe its superiority over Utah In football True the Idaho boys bos took tok better belter advantage of the con condition dillon but in so doing they the used tactics that would have surely surly defeated them tem on a dry dr field feld It is not thought for a minute Idaho I aho would have done this had the conditions been ben proper but the fact that they the did not give them m an advantage over Utah when it I comes come to playing yogi real r 1 football toot bal Why Utah Would Win There ere are tw two o reasons ra ons why wIry the writer believes Utah th would hae have wn on a dry dryfield dr dryfield field feld One Is It I has a better smashing backfield backfeld and a fat far stronger er line lne rhese These two elements element will 1 win a game any an time barring a fluke Some may ma disagree on the line lne argument but the fact ro ye mains that Idaho broke through but once and blocked a kick while Utah on ona Qt ona a dozen different occasions lons smothered Small with wih the ball bal in his hands and both teams practically kicked kick d the t same awe number of times Utah Uth did dil not tot try tr line lne over a t times on bucks but never nevor once In these t ese attempts did an Idaho man break through and an stop the play pla while on one occasion Convill 1 through foi fo a gain gainOn gin gainOn On the thE other hand because goal oal was WD not in danger and she could coult afford aford to take chances on line smashes the play pIn was frequently tried On not nota a single occasion was a substantial gain gin made mace in this manner while frequently Utah broke through and stopped the tho play pia back of the line lne This is II conclusive conclusive sive she that Utah has a better line lne Comparison of Back Fields Idaho claims cl a fast back field f ld and the writer wrier believes they the have havo one of ot the best In the country Trick plays and fast end runs should then be bc their forte foite arid and probably bl is but is is s Idaho master at this kind of a game a Utah has always aiwas been noted for or this very style of oC j PlaY ay a itself i and Is recognized as the superior of oC nn team in the nock flock o mountain division in back field fieldwork feld fieldwork work Idaho Idahl has a sprinter in Thorn Thornton Thornton ton but Utah tah has a man just as fast in H Richardson who in hi addition additon is twice as strong so 0 where here has Idaho Idalo got gotan any an the better beter of ot it In speed peed When hen it I comes to line lne plunging and am n a smashing back field feld compare Thornton Johnson and amI Lundstrom with Convill Comil and the two Richardson brothers The rue latter fatter later are just as fast mat man for fot man and will twill wi pounds to the thc man more mote in weight Admit dmit that Idaho Id ho is the the equal of f tho the famous famouS Utah eth hurry up team tem admit amit that Idaho has just as a many man tricks admit ami they the are equal in the forward pass p ss and anal an onside kick style st lo of game gae and we all al know these are strongest points Utah with her stronger line Une and anti bet better better better ter smashing pack back bac field feld would sweep swep Idaho Ic ho off of its feet f t in fri II two tO halves The game same would start with wih a a hard and stubborn fight but near the end the stronger line lne would bogin bagin to tell tel and th pounds to the man manin manIn manin in the back field feld continually hammering and ad smashing ng away awa would woul finally nal wear out their weaker opponents and with wih the last few minutes of play Utah taah would almost score at nt will wi over Oer their tired tred opponents |