| Show MORE SUITS FOR GLASMANN Three Attorneys Bring Action A ton Each for Three libel suits against the Standard Publishing company Frank Fk Francis Fanci and William Villiam Glasmann Glamann were filed fed In the tho dis district ds district court yesterday esterday by Attorneys C C Richards A E Pratt and J G Skeen each of whom asks Ik for 0 damages All Al three actions are based upon an art arti article at artcle cle printed printe In the Standard and Exam Examiner ExamIner ExamIner iner on or about January 29 2 of this year These articles are claimed by the te plain plaintiffs plaintiffs tiffs who ho acted as a counsel In another libel case cae against the same sae defendants defendant wIlch wh h was wa decided de about that time to have been defamatory The article artcle from which the libel suits suit filed fIed yesterday grew gew was published with wih photographs of the attorneys who acted for Glasmann under the caption capton Jury Exonerates the Standard and William Glasmann in Libel Suit SuIL The charges in each complaint are ae of a similar nature After Ater quoting the article said to be ob objectionable objectionable the complaint sets set forth That the defendants defendant meant thereby that the action acton referred to In the tho pub publication was wa a groundless action acton and known to be bo such by the plaintiffs but nevertheless said plaintiff and associate counsel for the plaintiff in the action acton for their own personal ends end and pecuniary benefit Instigated and Induced the bring bringing bringIng bringing ing and prosecutions of said and otherwise corruptly and contemptibly de demeaned demeaned themselves in the prosecution of said action aton and that It I was and Is the tho practice of the plaintiffs to excite excie ground groundless gound groundless less Judicial proceedings for their own personal ends and pecuniary benefit That the publication was wa false and and was and Is wilfully and ad maliciously intended by the defendants defendant to expose expos the tile plaintiffs to public hatred contempt and ridicule and by means there thereof of the plaintiffs have been ben greatly dis distressed distressed and also injured and prejudiced in their reputations as attorneys and coun counsellors couns s at law in the state of Utah as aswell asWell well V el as a In their capacity as citizens of said state and ad have also lost and been deprived of great geat gains gain and profits as they are Informed and believe beleve which would otherwise have arisen arsen and accrued to them tem In their profession and business to their damage In the tile sum or of each ech Attorneys Richards Pratt are the attorneys for each of ot o the plaintiffs This Thi makes about a dozen libel suits in which the aggregate amount of damages Is more than which are now i pending against the same defendants tn I Ithe the state courts r I |
