Show JUDGE MISSED COURT TERM TERMAs As a Result Supreme Court Decides That Case Decided on Another Day Must Be Ee Tried Again The supreme court decided yesterday that terms of the district court can only be held at the times fixed by law and that when terms are held at other times all aU Judgments entered are invalid The case in which this decision was rendered was that thal of John E Myers against the East Bench Irrigation com corn company compan pany pan appellant Justice wrote the decision the other Justices concur concurring concurring concurring ring The action was brought to restrain the irrigation company compan from increasing its capital stock and amending its articles of Incorporation The case was tried In Garfield county May Ia 5 S i and n r 1 1005 ii Judge Chidester ester of the Sixth fixed the time of holding court in Garfield county count for April 19 Ii ac according according according cording to law la A session was held how howver howver howver ver March 22 in Garfield and adjourned to such a time as the court might deter determine determine determine mine The session was reconvened May Mayd d S to try tr this action Judge Greenwood presiding No court was herd held Auril 19 The supreme court ourt says in this connection connection tion The court was not legally legall In session on May Ia 5 Terms of court can only be beheld beheld held at the times fixed by law and If I not held In accordance a with the statutes statute the proceedings will be void A meeting of the Judge and the officers of the court at atthe atthe atthe the place but not at the time fixed as provided by b law for holding court is not nota a court and all acts as such must be regarded as IS coram non Judice The court says sars that when whon court was adjourned in Garfield county March Marek 20 O Othe the April Avril term ended and could not be reconvened until the tho following April Apri In the case of the Wasatch Orchard company against the Morgan Canning Co appellant for due on goods the tho th supreme court affirmed the lower courts decision in favor of othe the plaintiff |