Show BACK IN FEDERAL COURT COURTna na Suit Against Wa Company Transferred celebrated rek water w ter case of Thomas nd md against t th the Ogden Waterworks any appears to be moving regularly r and an forth between the federal and courts This fIlls action was commenced time ago in the federal court and andes es 18 something like Judge nail hill appointed Dan Homer of this title as es referee to take testimony te upon i the he court was Willi to decide Two weeks when several Beveral days dave da had bad been spent II ent fe e taking of the testimony counsel he plaintiffs plaintiff refused to take any anver er r testimony ad and appeared appear the next n 0 the federal court at Salt Lake that the action be dismissed ut prejudice This move was op by counsel for the waterworks my any In but the motion was wal granted and tae ae dismissed i PW w days ago lIP a new action was corn com corned comin corned ed in the district court the com corn t being virtually the t same ame as in the t from the federal court the iffs I to ver for alle all ed l gesis t ie Vh crops of farm t Plata Pals City Oty In 1905 Yesterday coun countr tr I r the defendant company Imp n appeared e C district court and petitioned the theto theto theto to int an order of removal moval r of ofie ise se ie to the United States circuit court courte le It e in dIvision of The state of The jm was granted by Judge V i i throws the h lit case caliA ka t 51 V It was just two I as TWe Ti vat of the ease again federal court means that thai the case ea 3 it tt be tried prior to next Septem Jbard I bards 0 Pratt and George ereon are are the attorneys for the de do ante ant And A G C Horn and orn om rn are acting for the plaintiffs |