Show BURTON CASE N IN SUPREME COURT COURTr r f D Defendant Contends That Judg Judgment ment Should Be Reversed to 4 1 POINTS RAISED BY COUNS L i H I MOND f i iW l t A ASHIN ION NO Nov on W vV taming the I sel for Senator Joseph U It Burton of Kansas were filed In the thao United I ed edI I States court today The COUlt bis advanced the case f rh arl g on Mon Monday ay the Counsel for Sena Senator r that tha the judgment of the blow should hould be wholly If lt j ii In Insl Insisted sl ted that the United t tes aj not Interested in the que tion whether heUler a fraud order should uld the Grain S curit company and that correctly the lower 1 should have sustained the thc demurrer to r the indictment or should have granted a motion in arrest of jUdgment or w di directed a t for Jor the defendant I Counsel held there was no to establish the guilt of the defendant I I and that the court erred in refusing to J direct a 0 verdict ot of not guilty r The he do de defendant j It Js Is contended during the time of his employment by the Rialto j r did not eveR even kno knols that an anI I inquiry was before the postoffice de department department as to it a fraud order rd r should Issue anti and he never rendore an any service ha having ing any reference to the 15 l I of ft a fraud order I It is maintained that St Louis court un under er the con constitution had no ju juI I of alleged offenses based on the checks to SenatOr Burton whIch I f the facts at the trial showed d were made t in Washington and not In t LouiS Loui that no services were p O b by before the for the salary which was to him himI I iI cash in St Louis on March arch 6 1903 I that th the court erred In trying Burton 1 when the senate senat was In session sion and andI also in pronouncing of fin fine I and imprIsonment him to be executed at a time when toe the senate was in sessIon f |