Show ITEMS ARE DISALLOWED Receiver Weavers Administration tion of Bear River Riv r Irrigation Case Up in Court One of the Ule latest phases hass of oC the long Iong pending case of ot Samuel M and other trustees of ot bondholders against the Bear Br River Irrigation Ogden Waterworks company was sas reviewed yesterday in the te federal court by Judge Marshall decreeing that some of the Items disallowed by Master Mater In Chancery Lewis Lewi in the account of ot former ormer Re Receiver Receiver coiner Weaver were properly excepted to t and that other exceptions were al allowable a Among Amon the t items lems held to have bane been properly disallowed were for lor money paid to the Fidelity Deposit Depot company of ot Baltimore for tor assuring by way of Indemnity the th sureties suretes on on the receivers bond and 1000 paid to t the Utah Sav San Savings SavIngs ings logs Trust company for tor furnishing the required additional bond of at as a security for tor the receiver holding the worth of ot the defendant com corn negotiable bonds In the latter he evidence Instance it i was w shown by that W V S became surety on the bond in the first Instance and to secure seure him and the Utah Uth Savings 1 Trust company he be held eld possession of ot the bonds for the receiver However the court cur refused to in concur In the dis disallowance disallowance allowance of the charge for expressage on the negotiable bonds and for record recording recording ing the trust deed d ed Receiver Weavers cavers compensation at 50 a a month and his attorneys fees tees at monthly were allowed by the man mas master ma manter ter by consent of all aU concerned and only the receiver excepted to the In Inadequacy inadequacy adequacy of or the allowance to himself In his opinion Judge Marshall holds that the exception was wa not well based ba Items amounting to about 2000 00 were disallowed by b the master mater In the re me receivers rec c account for tor traveling expenses claims caima paid for the operation of the te defendant fruit frit farm far etc and the court concurs in the masters maters action acton The Item Iem of at 1024 In taxes te paid was disallowed because the receiver neglected to apply to the board of equalization eq for the abatement of the tax lax and for this reason the th court con concurs concurs concurs curs with wih the masters finding The receiver demanded an additional allowance of about 1000 00 to himself and attorneys for tor services and expenses In Incurred Incurred incurved curved In attending the masters maters exam examination examination Inton of the account of receivership but the court court concurs in the disallow disallowance dislow disallowance ance anc for the reason reson that the te unsatisfactory unsatisfactory factory fador manner In which the books were kept necessitated a Jong ong and ad ex expensive expensive expensive pensive examination the cost of or which is not a proper charge against the in insolvent Insolvent insolvent solvent estate |