OCR Text |
Show C1VJL CALENDAR. Notice to Attorneys and Parties. On Tuesday, the 10th day ol February, Feb-ruary, 1878, the call of tbe civil calendar calen-dar fcr trial will be commenced in the diutrict court of the Third judicial district. Not exceeding eight cases per day will be called for trul, in tbb following order, to wit : 1 II. W. Lnwreuce et al. vs. S. R Mulliu; Henipstuttd & Wamble; Koa-bornugh Koa-bornugh it Murritt. H Victoria imperial 1'. & M. Uu. vs. John 11. Kly; Koaburoiiyb & Merrill; Mer-rill; Hempstead &. Uumble. j 3 Victoria Imperial X. & M. Co. Yd. John H. Kly; same attorneya. j 4 Oscar Ludwig et a'., v. J.ab T. Gove; hUydun fc Uilcbnot; W. i-V. Uee. 5Charles W. Buhofield v8. Isaac S. Waurmau; Hempstead & Uimblcj KosborougU & Merrill. G Ueortte Ainaworth et al. va. Eliae Hotchkus ol al.; John ii. Duley; in person. 7 Warren HuEsey vs. Maaou M. Hill; Marshall & Koyle; Btakiu o. DeWolle. 8 Joaeph K. Walker et al. vs. Thomas Taylor el ui.J Bunnell fc Whitney and Patterauu; Marshall & Kuyle and Kosborough fe Meruit. y Mnry Admiro vs. Kootiri T. Bur ton; Tihord &. Hagau and Woods fc Uee; Z. Bnow. 1U yeorte A. Jnckaon va. H. M. DiiR;ll; lihurd & Jaagiiu; Htuipeleitd 11 John H. Lalwy vs. John . Jobnion; C. K. Gilchrial; EoBbcrouyh & Merntt. 12 Alex, Ttirbet et al. vs. D. T. dmitb et al.; Alex. Tarbet in peraou; Til ford t Hagan. la Frank J. Hirth et al., vs. H. B. Clawson et al.; Lomar and Williams Will-iams & Young; SneeliB & Kawliusi and C. K. Gilchnat. 14 Frank. J.. Hirth et al., vs. H. B. Clawson el. al.; J. D. Lomax; dneeks & iiawlinsaud C. K. Gilchrist. 15 Isaac Roland vs. H'nman Gray et ah; Robertson it McBride; Cheeks &, RawlinB and 0. K. Gilchrist. 10 B. M. DuRell et al. va. Farley B. Granger; Hempstead, Bennett & Htirkneea; Williams & Young. ! 17 Isaac Roland vs. Juhn W. Goldttiwait et ul,; Kubertson & McBride; Mc-Bride; C. K. Gilchrist and WilliaojB &, Young. Iti-GeorgeE. Whitmy vs. Isaac Waterman; W. W. Woods; Roabor-ough Roabor-ough & Merrilt. I 19 George W. King va. Enoch tieeae et al.; Uempslead & Gamble; no aitorneys. 20 Wells, FarRO & Co. vs. Mat thewT. Gi:born; Marshall & Royle; RoBborough fc Merritt. 21 C. D. Rybiaon vs. WiuBor Jc i Randall; Lewis Buroea; Beuuelt tt Harkness. 22 Wyoming C. &, M. Co. vs. Thomas Warded; Hempstead & Gamble Gam-ble and Williams; J. G. Sutherland. 2a M. Kinuer etal. vs. Chicago Gladiator T. & M. Co; C. W. Bennett; ill ford & Hagan. 24-Winauiuck S. &. M. Co. vs. U. P. i'uwell ot ft!.; Marshall & Royle; Tilford & Haan. 26 Jonn S. Barnes et al. vs. Charles F. Smith et al.; Baekin & DeWoKe; Williams ifc Young. 26 John F. Whitney va. Alladdin G. & 8. M. Co.; J. G. Sutherland; Bennett & Harkness. 7 Ouarles G. Boren vs. Hans Chiareson; Marehail & Royle; Z. Snow. 2S R. C. Chambers et al. vb. Jmes HarritiRton et al.; Bennett &. Harkneus; J. G. Sutherland. 29 R. C. Chambers el al. va. James Harrington et al,; Bennett Si Harkness; J. G. Sutherland. 30 B. 4. M. Froiseth vs. Charles 3. Ericzon; J. G. Sutherland; Hoe & Jonassou. 31 Jonathan M. Williamson et al. vs. James W. Snyder et al.; C. K. Gilchrist; Bennett & Harkue;s. 32 Geo. W. Norton ve. James W. Snyder; 0. K. Gilchrist; Bennett & Harkness. 33 C. C. Cunningham va. Fred-, erick Reich et. al.; tiee bo rough & Merritt; Bennett & Harkness. 34 R. C. Chambers vs. Frederick Reich et. al.; Buskin & DeWolfe; Bsnnett & Harkness. So Lathrop Duuu et. al., vs. Frederick Fred-erick Keicu et. al.; Baakin 6l DeWolfe; Bennett &. Harknoss. 36 Wm. R. Carver vs. Ii. C. .amKrs C. K. Gilchrist; Hemp-ateu Hemp-ateu A Gctmbie. 87 Harvey Rickard et. al., vs. C. C. Cunningham et. al.; Benuctt & Harknpss; C. K. Gilchrist. 38 James Harrington ct. al., ve. R. C. Chambers et. al.; J. G. Sutherland; Suther-land; Bennett & Harkness. 3y Frederics Reich el al. vb. J. M. Williamson et al. ; Bennett & Harknas; C. K. Gilcbnst. 40 Herman Kaiser vs. A. Kubn &. Bro.; Margary & Williams; E. P. Iom rj son. 41 Frederick Reich et al. vs. C. C. Cunningham et al.; Bennett fc Hark-uess; Hark-uess; C. K. Gilchrist. 42 David B. Brinton et al. vb. A. S. Patrick; Rosboru.-U & Menitt; Bikini Do Wolfe. 43 James G. Brown vs. John P. Larson; B.tskiu & DeWolfe; Hoa-borough Hoa-borough A, Merritt. 44 L. Livingston et al. vs. L. Benitea et al.;Ja$. B. McKea'u &. Son-Roe Son-Roe borough tfc Merrill. 4o RuwU ,t Jewell vs. Baker fc Nelson; Diiley Jc Burmeslcr; Retd and Woods & Gee. 4G James W. Bnrnham ct :il. d Anson Call et al., Hoge k Jomusun; Bates & Sutherland. 47 Monroe Klinu et al. vs. F. p Lonestreet et ah; F. Hutiman; no at torneys. 46 Peter Clays v9. M. M. Hill; F. Hoffman; Bask id & DeWolf. 49 Weils, Fargo A Co. v. I .Oil is Rcinfield; M.nbll & Koyle; lien nelt t H.rkiim. 60 Etm Daia n. Tdcoma S M Oo.,B.ltin4 DeWolle; ii.uuelt i |