OCR Text |
Show A NEW RELIGION. Salt Lake, May 17, 1S79 Editors Herald: Did yeu take c zina ot ihu fact tbatancwkioJ ot religijo came t.-i tbe surtdca dariu the Miles triii, which new religion tnilit be appropriately ap-propriately termed judicial religion ? The principal, if i.oir Lly tenet ot this new judicial religion, tuny he brirtly furciulaled thus: " I briierf that the law of the land 13 superior lo the Uw ef God." Or, nure briilly, "Humsn law ie higher thuu di?ine Uw." If thii is not the only i-tiet of this new judicial religion, it is at least equivalent equiva-lent to th-3 ehibboletii ol the dvL.tees. As it appeared t.i rp, iu the abve-named abve-named trial citizei.a were debarred from a seat on the juiy brcause iliey would not subacribe, aud they could no', do 60 conscientiously, to the above-elated singular religious ttuet. This leida me to rctL-ct a little on the possible operation of this new judicial ju-dicial religion. Too Us ol nature are held by religiouitta to te the laws of Gcd. But by this new judidal religion these laws of nature and of God are racked as inferior; to tiie law of the land. Thus the ' laws of planetary rotation, of the recurrence of the seasons, 0 day and ni;ht, of gravitation, of annual bud and flower ad leaf and fruit, and ol all vegetable growth, of animal prc-crestibn prc-crestibn and development, ofeuu and air, of heat and coid. i' evaporation aud precipitation, oi tuuuder and lightning, of mipt and raiu, of snow and ice, iu short the laws cf iife and death, are tho laws ol God, but, according ac-cording to this new judicial religion, they musst be accounted interior to the , Uw of the laud, tor this latter is the ! only supreme law. If congrcB3 should make a law contravening the above-: mentioned laws of Uod, or any of them, this new judicial religion would requiie a man to Bar let the laws ol congress be true it all thoae djviue laws are lies. The law of God says, "Thou ehalt not forswear thyuelf." But this new judicial religion eays, "Thou ehalt forswear thyself." The law of God Bays, "Thou ehalt not bear false witness, wit-ness, thou shait not covet, thou shalt not lie, thou ehatt not eteal, thou Bhalt not commit adultery." But if congress should make a law requiring requir-ing citizens to bear false witness, to covet, to He, to steal or to commit adultery, then this new judicial religion would require citizens to disobey the law of God in that particular and . honor the law of the land. I This ie a queer religion, isn't it? What do you think of it? What a vast amount of judicial ingenuity it must have taken to invent such a unique religion, unless, indeed, it was stumbled stum-bled upon by accident, and then what a fortunate accident ! In survey ing this strange religion I am lost iu wonder, won-der, though not in love and praise. I wonder how it wiil work whether il will supercede all other religion?, whether it wiil swallow them up bodily, as Atron'B rod-esrpent did the rod-serpents ol the Egyptian n,agi cians. Moauwbile, are we not living in truly eventful times? Js not thie a a truly great country? Are we not blessed with a truly gre.it judiciary? And, laslly, will dpi t Liu new judicial religion prove a potent factor in the long desired solution of the vexatious "Mormon" problem? I wonder what the end will be. I wonder, aud I wait to a? e. Dobus, |