Qif.hy. Is it true, as reported. that one of the jurymen on the late c:i-r of Bates vs. thc U.P.R.R. Co., tried be fore the District Court, aid in one of the hotels three days previous to the termination of the trial by the di-a-greemeut of the jury, that that jury would not agree on - a verdict ? And was he the man who did not and would not agree with the other eleven ? Such is current report : and if the a-cribed remark was made, it must have been made in the presence of some poison who can testify to it. If so, let u-have u-have the facts, when further comments will follow.