Show INCOME TAX SUIT ConstltjitlnnnHty of the Zjatv Argned In Court WashHiiiston Jan 1Thc hearing of tire argument of the plaintiff in th ° sat of John D Moore against Internal Revenue Rev-enue O Hnm4ss oner Miller to test the cxMJSUtutfonaMity of the Income tsrs was heard Sa the district equity court todaj Assistant AittorneyGeneral VhL rir v who opened the cure arsTi T that none 01 fte specJfto objections made > t tax Kbtees the auesticm of uniform fv wiThin the measiains of the corostitutun We are unable it to see toe said tat thfe act works double taxation as iu 9 claameO If it did it Is 5nnmatemi aa1 constitutes no objection to the tax et n under time odlanTy state con rtitutotns The objections tibet some corpor xU ana are taxed and others are not cerUiny does not upset the oonstttutionalUy of the law No Injunotian should be granted b e betause bus complainant has an j quajte remedy at Taw a principle u fed in a deelanutory st tutB A complainant com-plainant Jn equity muSt slKnv why a 1 gal remedy Is pot adequate f or Iis i rose r-ose It was next arguetf that the tax wise not a direct tax wrTnp tte m ai lag of tithe constitution an 1 t aeref on r required to be appxyrtitx iai amon steftes according to the e n t m It wae uniform within a const tuti jn il meaning Attorney Jere Wilson 4n f > per n r the compfalnant den < d tire was t quate remedy by lav ani aierte t various difiicuBti ccnfm10 I thr set for the complainant in fling the sn The courts are renirf jo > lnterff o with the collection of tiif 3 taxes It is a case he c > ntrd crhe the courts can interfere Tiere is r y poster in this case for anyone to pj1 n tax and recover the mony by prti If the citizen ever h ety relief T 1 the act turns out unfOn tt lona1 ti n all that is paid Js gone fars c an1 this th-is no remedy except an a ieal tj > ti > justiice of Oongress At this poiniWfiie gwvprnmpt askei f Tan T-an adjournment until onicrrw ail tn = case was postponed Judge Wilson will contJJu Ms arg mont tomorrow |