Show FROM HIS POCKET How Judge McKay Lost and Won 8245 0 TilE ROCK COMPANY MUST MOVE The Jury list Drawn in the Third District Court Yesterday Probate and Police Matters In the Third district court yesterday I morning the following venire from which the grand jury for the April term will be returnable selected was drawn and made on tho second Mondayin April 157A W 17 A Krigbaum 0 152 Frank Sn del 113 Thomas Stevens 170 George E Chandler 103D W Scribner 124J H Bowman 1C4C H Withey 58W H Casady 16S JohnE Foster 102 Lewis Helm 51 C Mather 50 Samuel McLmdon 122T C Rooklidge 155 William Pcrego 100F O Horn 27 Claud B Durst 191 James Hughes 177 Daniel Harrington 1JJH E White 1S5M M Brown The following venire of thirtyfive petit Jurors t serve during the April term was also drawn and mado returnable at the same time CSBoyd Park 16L H Farnsworth IiC A Bussche 80W J Mites 127J H Hinman 7SF H Auerbach 9J F Bradley 88J H Linck 120 John Strickley 1230 L Brown 120Thomas Harris 179 Myron Davis 193J H Kelley 11K MlrViAlne TnatLnolr 64W H Remington I 73G W Carter 37 Joseph Goehegan 74W S McCornick 42A M Grant 1S1C H Lashbrook 75J B Kerr ICG Lovi Bachus 77 George L Lambourno 31C O Farnsworth 140M Monheim 184 Edward Egan 145 Henry Hirschman 150 John Shilds 79 Newton Cearned 02 Henry Cohn 40 John McVicker 123 Henry Carrigan 142C1 A Tewkesberry 150 James Berry 190 Henry Prosser AGAINST MR SHOWELL In the case of Fred L C Olson vs Will iam Showell which was tried on Friday the jury brought In a verdict for tho plaintiff plain-tiff for 512158 The defendant was allowed thirty days in which t file a motion for a now trial ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE In the case of Elizi Brown vs Alexander Alexan-der Brown an order was made requiring thodefendant t show cause why alimony should not be paid DISMISSED BT CONSENT consent Fitzgerald vs Fitzgerald dismissed by MR MKAYS MONET The case of William McKay against L Simon was then taken up and tried W H D son appearing for the plaintiff while Judge Powers represented Mr Simon The case w san interesting one involving the question of the liability of a hotelkeeper for loss incurred by his guests From the ovidenqo i appeared that in May last Mr McKay visited Park City and stopped at the defendants hotel During the night a thief entered his room and stole about 5 in cash from his pants pocket The defendant de-fendant claimed that ho was not liable for the loss because it was a rule of the house that guests should deposit money and valuables valu-ables in the safe The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for the amount sued fer8243 SUITS DISMISSED The People vs Alfred Solomon et al suit on bond judgment satisfied and suit dismissed United States vs David James suit on bond settledand dismissed EXCUSED W E Jacobs a petit juror was excused AGAINST THE ROCK CoPY In the case of the United States against the Salt Lake Rock company and others Engineer Brooks and Dr L Hall and Dr J Richards who were recently appointed to examine the scene of the operations of the defendants in RedButto canon and ascertain if the work being done by them fouled tho water of the creek reported that some of the houses maintained by the defendant should be removed and recommended that the employees of the rock company be restrained re-strained from using the land lying contiguous contig-uous to the creek An order was made in conformity with the recommendations Judge Zane held that tho defendants were not in contempt but assessed the costs of prosecution against them |