Show IN JUDICIAL CIRCLES f The Fair e endant and the Diamond Solitaire 1 I 4J > HE WANTS SOME KOBE MONEY c A Dlnpute Over Valuable Properly A flJarrlnee Annulled fit vorct Granted Ueueral Items Yesterday morning at 10 oclock there sat In the office of Gomuiis3ioncr Norrell the individual quest of whom Deputy Pratt had departed for Grand Junction Colorado the previous day The complaint which caused the arrest of the fair one had been sworn to by A B Cutlet who charged the woman in questiop with stealing a diamond ring of the value of 125 the offence being tnereorej grand larceny Time wore on and the fair one began to grow impatient im-patient She nervously tapped the flpor with her foot loosened Her scarf and otherwise gave evidence that she was not at all pleased at the action of the complainant in dragging her back from Grand Juuction Another wait at the expiration of which tne Uominfs stoner asked her if shr desired to secure toe services of an attorney to def nd ner ithe replied no and lat r said she had evidently misunderstood him Would he repeat the question He would and did Grace for iliHt was the ladys name then thought it would pfernaps be better were sni to consult some legal ugh t and lapsed into sileuoe Chen a happy idea seemed 10 strike her ahe glanced drat at a Tribune reporter who was buried deeply in a cutting from the latest copy of the Christian at Work but her manner indicated that she had mentally decirfi d some question in the negative Then her dark brown orb were turned in the direction ot a representative of the Ntws The question ques-tion as to whether he was an attorney i atlaw seemed to oe decided in the affirmative as her taper fingers beckoned aim in her direction He bl ishiugly declined the laurel she1 would have laid upon his brow Another wait was then iadnlged in and at 11 oclock the Commissioner decided de-cided to adjourn until 2 pm which he accordingly did Before that hour however the case had been settled and tho fair defendant had scored a complete com-plete triumph the plaintiff receiving receiv-ing a pretty severe scoring at the hands of the District Attorney Cutler and the defendant had it appears been on very intimate terms for several months past both rooming in the same establishment The ring in question had been frequently loaned to the defendant by the plaintiff and was in her possession quite as much as in his own Friday last he asked her to return re-turn it to him saying sue had worn it long enough She took it from ber finger and threw it on a table in his room Saturday morning she was again in the room in quest in when she picked up the ring and resumed possession of it He asked her to return re-turn it and she laughingly ran away That afternoon she told him she would like to see him at 5 oclock and the appointment ap-pointment slipped from his memory The next morning was Sunday and when the plaintiff arose he discovered that defendant had left for the cast He hurried to the depot but the train had gone On Monday b swore outthe t complaint that caused her arrest On being apprehended at Grand Junction B letter was found miller person addressed > ad-dressed to Cutler telling him that she had his ring and would be back in about four weeks j if he wanted before that time however she would send it to him There was no evidence on which the defendant could be held and she was therefore discharged The deputyCEVhq made the arrest was so disgusted with the whole affair thatjhe refused lo surrender the rine untiljts owner had deposited sufficient csslto pay the defendant Ii fare and expeLJs as far as Grand Tuuction Colat which town qbfi had been arrested HE WANTED MORE MONEY The case of John M Hurst vs George Edgington came up before Judge Zane in the morning PlafntTif s claim was that the defendant was indebted in-debted to him in the sum of somewhere about 350 which had occurred ia this vise In March 1881 plaintiff and defendant entered into a verbal agreement agree-ment for the purpose of forming a partnership to deal in cattle raise stock etc At that time plaintiff was employed as engineer on the Utah Eastern and deposited in the Co operatie Store at Ooalville 1 000 from which defendant was to draw for the purpose of purchasing pur-chasing stock Defendant turned nto the firm a number of head of ait e but plaintiff could not say how many and there was no understanding understand-ing as to just what proportion either plamutl or defendant was to own and ontrol Several email sums of money were put into the firm by the plaintiff after this amounting in all to about 250 Some four months afterwards the defendant sold the entire bunch of cattle to Moses Burns of Piedmont Wyoming for the sum of 1970 Meeting Meet-ing plaintiff shortly afterwards defendant defend-ant handed him a check for 900 with the remark that that was his proportion of the money derived from said sale some of the cattle having becn lost It was for the difference between 1970 and tbe amount claimed to have been put up by the plaintiffthat the suit was brought Tne defecdants testimony was to the effect that the plaintiff had agreed to pat into the concern 1000 in caSh and a further 200 as soon as he could earn it against the cattle then owned by the defendant that defendant was to have entire control of 4he business on terms of equal parrnerfhip and was to dispose of the stocK in such manner as bis best judgment rnuht dictate He lurther alleged that lie hacfpersonRlh bought catte amounting to i2tj wnich were ill the herd at the time the entire bunch was sold to Moses Barns He re eived he said for the stock thus sohi 1976 of his bc gave plaintiff 900 paid Mr Cluff from Whom he borrowed tbe 126 referred l to above and nrpjid the balance on expense recdlng and herding the animals etc The case was not concluded at 4 pm and the court being desirous of attending to some other business it was postponed till 2pm dayS day-S JLE DISPUTED KOPZRTY The cas of H rum S Kimball et al TS C E Tolhurst was the nett in order and after Mr Rawlins had stated to the j jdee what he expectedto prove and one witness had ban partialy examined ex-amined the court aijourned until this mo ning at the usual hour It appears that for a long period of years twenty or more Hyrum S Kimball Eugene Kmiball and tneir mother occupied that piece of pr perty situated on the Southeast coruer of Main and North Temule Street near the aqueduct that tdeyere Constant residents there un f ill they moved north some ten years agd s since which time the house and laud bas been ocsmiied by their teunuts Some four years ago Heber P Kim Ldlt disposed of a uortion of this property prop-erty to the wife of Eoer Case and she last spring conveved it to C E Tol hurst The Kiinwlld now b ing suit to recover this portion alleging in brief priority riihta in tbe ma tr The cas jvill be continued ttm morning A MABBIAGK ANSULLKD A rather interest ug case was that of John E Sherlock vs Laura A Cler burne L uppettre from tho evidence dduced that on the3d day of June 1885 the pinIOn and defendant wno are cousins were married at Cheyenne Wyomips and at thJ time both auopuail the marriage was legal le-gal S on after toe ceremony the couple left and went to Montana and afterwards l clime on to Salt Lake this qiiently it w3 discovered that the marriage law ut Wyoming forbade tile union of first COUUMUS aud therefore there-fore their marrIage was null and void Defendant left plaintiff on the lOtb day of May 1886 and has not since lived ivith him as his wife He therefore asked that said marriage be annulled and Judge Zaue ordered that a decree be entered A DIVORCE GRANTED In the Case of Belie Langstroff vs J Laugstroff a divorce was allowed and plat tilf granted toe care and custody of her children DISMISSED John Judge vs George Morrison et al case dismissed I |