Show ASSISTANT SCCRETAKY of the Treasury glSSgl l Jp5 VCL11 < 1 two B1W Characteristic Characteris-tic opInIons in pension cases in both instances in-stances reversing former rulings In one case the soldier was hit on tne leg with a emijohn tOml by ri corporal and in the Other1 ease the claimant was miming when he was tripped by a comrade the result being broken collar bone Pensions arc allowed in both these cases BUSFI holding hold-ing that the claimants were injured in line of duty It would be difficult to conceive of an injury to an exsoldier which TAXXER and BUSSEY would not rule was received in the line of duty |