Show DISTRICT COURT AJ3jiS3Diy at Justicex tuft Department of I t The session of the District Court yesterday yes-terday Judge Zane presiding was occupied oc-cupied chiefly in the hearing of the case of Catherine S Margetts executrix et al va Anthony Sodbe the result of i which is elsewhere published in this issue W H Ray vs E I Allison et al continued by stipulation filed I The People vs Frank Fields embezzlement i embez-zlement Defendant was arraigned and asked if he wished counsel to defend him to which he replied that he did not and pleaded guilty giving the judge his version of why and how he appropriated I appro-priated the various articles named in the indictment WueicuIOn the Chief Vereupon Justice blandly askefi him if he had ever before been ircerated in the penitentiary or previously been charged with any crime to whichField I answered in the negative His honor after considering the matter a few jnoments sentencea the young fellow to one year in thepenitentiary the smallest penalty allowed by tueS tue-S 3 3While the jury were out considering the Margetts verdict District Attorney Dickson made application for the restraining order the cause for which is in another column Peter Cunningham vs the Union Pacific Railway Company a suit to recover re-cover 125000 damages for personal injury in a coal mine of the defendant defen-dant and costs of suit Sheeks and Rawlins appeared for plaintiff and Williams aud Young for defendant A jury 1 was impanelled consisting of ressr Joseph H Proctor George W Earl W C Winder Louis Oviatt Carl C Asmussen J H Jensen 1 W Davis David Archibald D Booth Charles Gilinore George E Hill and D W Scrbner Fheexamination of witnesses wit-nesses was immediately begun and con tinned until 515 when the Court ad1 journed until this morning at 10 cIok f p 1 0 |