Show The lleggel Case Some days ago we mentioned that LBeggel had again been arrested at thnstance of PhiltdelphPt pai ties ciargig im with liavinob tairTetf goods under false pretenses from Daniel Meyers and Charles Goodman Reggel applied for a writ of habeas corpus and the matter mat-ter has heretofore been argued and submitted The court rendered an opinion and decided that it could not discharge the applicant and refused the writ and remanded the applicant appli-cant Reggel excepted tpJ the ruling of the court and gave notice of his intention to appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States pending which appeal and the determination thereof he moved that bail be fixed and that an order be made directing the clerk of the court to transmit a transcript to the Supreme Court of the United States The respo nrlen claimed that there was no provision for a stay of proceedings and objected ob-jected to any The Court however allowed the stay of proceedings and fixed the bail at 83000 which was furnished Isadore Morris and W S McCornick appearing as sureties The applicant was allowed sixty days in which to make the appeal The arrest was made at the instance of the governor of Pennsylvania and the matter one of extradition it having for been decided against Eeggel Arthur Brown Esq and M Kirkpatrick Esq appeared for Reggel and the state of Pennsylvania Pennsyl-vania was represented by Marshall i Royle I |