Show SCIENTISTS REPLY To 10 A Committeeman Issues Answer to Criticisms of Doctrine by Minister QUOTES FROM SCRIPTURES PASSAGES S ThOM HIOM MRS EDDYS BOOK BOOI ALSO CITED O to UM tIN tb Criticism of or a Salt Lake Lak minister tw UM the state stat publication pu commute fw t baa hu le leu iud u 4 th tM following Webster W define deaD d log logt as aa the tIo soi eI enc n e or art of oC exact ramming r Now lt 11 us Ui u M Tho Tb minister quote from frem rem t V e Christ ion el text book na a fol fo folio io Jw w belne v vr r present tt It t fol fel follows f lows J la IoNIc that evil el the tile sap HIt HItt t opposite of ot goof good 1 Is la I never ner neverIn p In my opy e p of or a ami aad am Health tt ILia t Is rea m a follow Cod God K Jr 44 M being b In rr per ver r pren it follows In dl dIne Ine I lc tc that JI tb opposite of ot l Ig Ie MV plent The Th nb tae I 1 III tb the pego e In beth bath m f t but tho th logic la In U the tho o latter Ix J 1 plainer Ial and become baroin absolutely ab in Ji The Dible declare df the tho Lord Ho ne H Is Ia IsAl I Id d Al Alco Aillo o Ig Ie all au is Ie Iena nought na tJ eM beside beld Him In Ia geometry we that het when he two things are eQual t th the same earn m thine thing thory the are an equal to ta rich Hh other Therefore It follows follow math erratically and logically that tt 1 lIS Is lISow kl ow if It God good eod l I Is all and aad over evor evorT T which pm toe clergyman x I ems raa to accept wh where ro will wUl ko he tad find tadi V 11 i J I In experience 1 except a ma a false f i M It dont do t do to talk about t tT k Iti Imi this thu thi matter If is le a tr K In It t It ought to bo M explained A AJi Ji tf I explanation will bo he b more re natia ry t tan n to Py simply that tt tho the I t If III I wn before exhausting in rl II omi it Ion and I 1 untrue V In I the th hance rot for condition In Int Inti t ti it i m There Tho ria simply Imply arent aront SUN 11 Th ih critic further says ay 1 I am told f it tit it require loa Ions I application to be f i 1 to t comprehend the real ral meaning 0 i Ince nce and Health TIll This FbI Is not the tho ehIn of Christian Science and BO Iff BOt Ifft t V r eIRe Jile ie J 1 not so el serious as 5 the Ute critic seems to think On paso palO of oZ Sc Sconce once enco and Health we read reail The pur purpose purpose purpose pose and motive to live lIyo aright can be begin begin begin gin now This point won you havo flavo started as a you should You Tou have havo be begun begun gun fUn Christian Science and nothing but wrong Intention can hinder your advancement With reference to tho the critics critic objection objection tion to tearing down tho the structure of at atour our natural reason the process s no doubt will at times time seem a little tough Dut But tho Scriptures take tako up this mat matter mattel mattar tel tar as of ot some somo necessity and say eay wo must put off the old man and put on the tile new And In 1st let Corinthians 14 we 0 read road The natural man not the things of the tho Spirit of ot God for fortney tRey are arc foolishness unto him neither can he know them because they are spiritually discerned The last statement In your report in substance tanco says that Christian Sd Science ence once heals heal by lifting tho the sufferers sufferer attention from mn her malady by belief In the nonexistence of sin sickness and death And we submit that there thereOn can oan be bo no sin ala nor trick In such lIuch work For If God good Is all which our critic seems to admit then sickness not being good cannot be bo real as ns a fact and by tho the Christ truth can be and should bo be cast out ot from frem the tho suffering human humon conscious consciousness ness noes leaving health and harmony In Instead I stead |