Show c t I DISCORDANT SOUND OF WEDDING BELLS Inharmonious Echoes Are p I Heard in Divorce Court by byI I Judge Lewis I NINE WINE DECREES GRANTED i i 0 j i Thomas Edward Butler Legal Separation by Default from Daugh Daughter ter of Former Governor Cutler j Desertion and IU o support were er ere the tha heis 11 on which eight Interlocutory andon and andon J on final decrees elcree of divorce were wera grant granted ed 54 by Judge T D Lewis at the usual divorce matinee yesterday y aft sit afternoon Thou Butler the uns nan ian wh who ho figured u ip II this tho th romance in inyl invoIcing voIcing the runaway marriage of the daughter of or former John C O Cul ul r was at granted 4 it i divorce by de 45 default fault tault on un the grounds ll of f desertion The TheS marriage which created a sensation anU at St attil S til ti time occurred ai OAt Ogden da June t 9 1 I 9 R and nd the tho ended a few days later lator when hen the bride returned to her nor I IIa ru home hUl sending a not to her ber Ia II of or me 1 1 few tea d dp deys with ith the IhO curt curtI I t the plaintiff MI ir il I 1 will c nut rt l return so 10 u you OU or live JIve livet t sIh lh you yuu ou Irisie M Ii lOa a granted a di dl diri dirin after tell tellin ri rn im rin I in ill 10 tu tit the court eurt that after her arrival In to ait it hake 1 4 few fw fara pr ago aKo to C Yo II tilt II h her hr Muter I here heie her hr husband wrote l l t hei h from frum Detroit informing her ber that h did not iut i l II to return to hint him t Wine Ii n the th husband bu band has failed filed to toc and the lIu plain c OU ii lobule to her i tur tl na is il been n for d to t earn uru rn her own O OU I liv U lIving lug I ilK fter making ire free tr use IRe of ot the prop pROPSt nix St 11 lAnd and like Ilk 3 8 0 which Itria ruia A to 10 him hi as asa asI I a dowry V deserted 4 li hr r and wit went lit to Idaho over a year Iari li ao a se t to the th story of ot the i esterday The couple were wera t 1 t in lit Salt taIt Lake July 2 1 6 but since V started for Idaho the ther fe r ha hs heard nothing more mol of him himI TiP Tle TI decre of was as K granted I Since ile tt ii marriage day da January 9 I lioi lui Vilate latt L l 1 Brown has hall been corn com compelled he 11 aid said i day to depend u UlOn on her lier mother mothr fr her hr support liu port her hei husband hub nd not 1101 even 11 providing Slie Sh hie wa aa granted a denee delree I at anI 1 the 1 it II lu it t f t i Itt i little child V tv h it ii U U alter Valter M I 4 Hi Blown own left i I IM t jl I for fr San Francisco he h sent his hia hist t ife r e Brwn Brun Hr n to t Salt alt Lake Laken LakeI auth n l then ha ht his I to tu p permit I h hr r to t return to him nor wr would he h heI I I I ene mt to It Salt Sail Lak The decree was as grani l t tt 11 the th gi u l of ut desertion I t hone h William v Rose Roue Is IB capable I t j of from tru j i e Ii a ad day Ullie 1 H R flue e t told uld the Ih curL court le ie 10 ha has refused t te i anSi thins I tar ard de her support UI 01 to 10 l le for Cur the I II i children ael a il i and 7 year years Inder the de dr doI I I ei cr C e K H Ha e i is j to tu p I pay v y 30 0 a It amoni moni nt II i 1 Failure to Provide rolde Caroline W an elderly woman wa a a Ii divorce from Ai drew Ji han rn n her tr hu hue bt bend iid 10 0 she ah une 11 married in I lt iH I The Th defendant ta wall vas alleged to hf hj failed fI to tu support the plaintiff and ands m s it wa 4 forced to become dependent I UIn ui n her hr children bj by b the th first Tt Ti plaintiff iff was aa awarded S 5 a month Since their marriage March U IS 19 UiT 1907 7 1 C Ieti A Picket i ball hax only provided his hia h hU wife U with two pairs pair of shoes h a d about aMut S 4 worth of oC clothing according to L Loaa La Ie Lat i t oUa oa Pickett the t plaintiff that i n rid also site she had hail be been a dependent upon pun her nU and ad tb the family of the tile defendant a as well a AI as upon her 1181 own la labor IMM bor for rr her support She was wall given Iven ih th custody u tod of f th the buy boy boyA buyA bu A final finai decree of divorce was waa en ea in lit the II case ease of t vary Mary Donovan l again 1111 Andrew Andrw Andr J lH novan |