Show I P Home Horns Interests First FirstI a April 5 That the Democratic senators who mho ho have hae local in hi hit affected by bv a reduction of the tariff on oni I tt It t lmh t might be injuriously i 1 will nil ill not for fj called upon to allow the declarations of or the tle Denver plat pInt is evident such reductions made of oC their n U 1 t stand Oland in the way opposing of North Carolina has bias written on the tile fi il lUr which Senator Simmons j t of If the tariff on lumber lIe He takes the position that the Democratic to the whole i Jc Je of a tariff for revenue only was as made with reference It d dues not Dot apply to any article r riff ff M tm stem rn and therefore ee Hid Did the thc Democrats he asks mean m LI to CO promise free frei lumber without of which It was waa to be a at aar aa measure of the tile general flY py regard to the character would result if ie that measure eo cred ered with ar a t or tr the lie discrimination that 1 hi K ily protective or prohibitive d duties on the Use same ante articles in the tl tI same gen gena genca genea ea ca a classification T THe He lie H answers his own question in the Ute negative and aya ay that t f give gie the aaton that construction would be letter of that th t promise hue Its spirit He then declares that the tariff for lumber lumbar Is 13 already alidy low as compared w with ith tho th duty on other building materials such as 5 steel iron and antI cement i J a acis ds I If we e are to have a tariff for protection it would wouW seem unjust to pro prou prot u t ite oj on and not another or to protect the Industries of ot one sec see i fon of ot the Use country nail aDd not those of another I He declaim however that even the nt duty of or 2 on lumber is la on th revenue basis boals and h t promises to do all that ho ha can to maintain the rate rater r |