Show TREA TV OPPOSED BY JONES Chairman of Committee on Merchant l Gives Views I Washington Juno June 24 Should the thc proposed fisheries treat treaty between tho the United States and Great Britain be be- ratified It Is beyond that within five fI years thereafter neither neith neith- er cr upon the North Atlantic nor Pacific Will vur thorn h f V Bol In I- th h c a cries erics u under th the tho American m i n flag Chairman Chairman Chair Chair- man Jones Joncs of ot tho Senate merchant marine marino ma ma- rine rino committee d declared In a a. lett letter letti 1 t tb to S Secretary Colb Colby mado public toda today b by the sona senator tor The Tho letter was wan 38 In reply to ono from Mr Colby regarding a proposed treaty between tho the United States and Great Britain ln which would grant the thc Canad ian Jan fishing vess vessels ls preferential 1 rh In ports of oC the thc United States Slates with freedom of ot port dues or charges now exclusive prerogatives of ot vessels of the tho United States Slates Would DC Be Oll Open u uIt It should n not t bo be bo forgotten tore Senator Sen Son ator Jones said said- that tho proposed tr treaty treaty- lY would open ports ports' of ot the Great lakes lakos and the tho gulf gult to foreign operations operations oper oper- and as aa well wen tho ports of ot California If It these ports are opened b by treat treaty to subjects of ot his British majest majesty ma ma- jest jesty aro are they to bo be denied If it de demanded demanded de- de to citizens of oC Japan On tho the Pacific coast It was with the greatest great great- est eat difficulty that the Japanese were eliminated finally from the deep sea fisheries oft off Alaska and at the present I time there are aro protests against the tho Japanese op operations from California I ports port notwithstanding operations ma may I bo ho Justified by Jy y reason of ot tho the order of ot tho the secre secretary ry of ot commerce Issued February Feb Fob mary 21 InS 1318 which remains yet ot in effect I Senator Jones said sad ho could not concur concur concur con con- cur In tho statement that the tho matters malters dealt cleaR with I h I In th the tho ir treaty t received ce cd the tho I most carel careful l consideration at tho the hands of oC the Can dJan fisheries fisheries' es' es esI con conference or or that the thc fishing In Interests In In- I on both Atlantic and Pacific coasts were given ample opportunity to express their views l Protective rot I Senator Jones Johes Jo said that the tho statements state state- ments monts In the hearing partial though the they were did not support the tho statement statement state state- ment that through tho provisions provision of or this treaty tho government ro will promote the thc development nt of or American fisheries What is required for or our fisheries I said tho the senator la Is sonic some truly pro protective pro pro- I I legislation rather than a treaty treat and certainly a a treaty based upon Ullon a a. so ono ono sidd Id d. d consideration of or orthe the tho subject et as 38 that accorded by tho the Canadian American fisheries conference should not be further considered on If Ie th there rc must ba be treaty con consideration let lct them bo he hart had only after full opportunity to pres present ril a all pertinent facts before an unbiased and representative s tribunal of ot Investigation n |