Show UTAH COPPER ENDS DIRECT TESTIMONY i Technical cal Evidence Offered i in jn Po Power er Rate Hearing Up to Date I Direct examination of ot witnesses ses iron or orthe the Utah Copper company against the application of tho Utah Po Power er company to the the- public utilities commission com corn I mission for permit to increase the i rates for power was concluded yesterday yester da day and this thle morning Judge John F F- MacLane w will wll ll begin his cross cross-c cross examina tion The evidence yesterday was technical technical technical tech tech- in El e every wa way A largo large number ot or phot photographs graphs were Intro Introduced uce In evidence evidence evi I dence and submitted as exhibits which the commission admitted H. lL C e. e Goodrich cn engineer ineer for tor the Utah Copper company compan gave evidence regarding regard regard- I f ing the available water supply If f examination Cross-examination of or C. C W. W Corfield chief electrician of ot the Utah Copper company compan was completed His IUs testimony testimony test test- mony was vas was on the load factor of the f Utah Copper company compan in the tho years e I 1917 Ins lilS and 1919 1911 showing an average average aver er age of ab about ut S SZ per cent Lewis B. B of or New York was recalled on the lc of or coal conI con con- I Hugh HaZeltine associated with tho the thoi i firm of Stillwell Putnam of NewYork New New- NewYork York testified as ns to the cost of or power per kilowatt hour I E. E J. J Franklin recalled testified to tor r the total annual cost ost b by steam plant I giving ln the tho cos cost with coal at aion u a uton ton ion at Magna at ate five e mills and a a. a L fraction fraction frac frac- tion per pel kilowatt hour i I I i I |