Show Dr PROHIBITION IS tF I AWAITING RULING eats on Amendment Are Concluded Before Supreme Court V O. March the constitutionality It y of tho L amendment and portions of the t o or n r nt act Hero concluded to today ay court Seven separate supreme l. l now not rest with tho the courts or ar determination were on apt ap- ap today arguments Th The t ne ds brought by Christian pan s 5 J J. from federal court f Newark N. N NJ roes rees dismissing injunction T c dge 4 d- officials ks ge s t to enjoin prohibition rom im m preventing him from Crom than one one- containing moro more k beer alcohol and on cent jf lt t of one per appeals from Judgments training straining officials from rom Interfering th Ith the Products coma com- com iy r a a. Wisconsin concern In the tho of beer containing 25 35 5 per int at t of alcohol by volume ft Wakes Drakes on OD Wording D. D GuthrIe appearing In theer the tho lam per er contended that by tho thou words Concurrent nt power ver to enforce Cons Con's Con- Con s 's s Intended the federal govern JOvern and the states to enforce with Identical legislation and andt andr r t th the states were wore to give give- their ap- ap val eal to enforcement legislation bee be- be vc e becoming effective 0 submit that tho tho- state le legisla- legisla sIa- sIa must have understood that tho the provided for concurrent as 33 tho amendment states t i Guthrie said Tho The construction w nr 1 urged by the government t would It In practically tho the complete loss to state control If Ie this point were tween individuals we wo might well It a a. point of or fair air conduct and allt allty d Evidence nc Charge piled charges that evidence evidence- was be- be manufactured by prohibition sup- sup to Influence the tho court In conIon conlon con- con Alon lon Ion with Its consideration of or the question mado made b by Mr brIe bile lie IMo o called attention to an pension o of remarks remarks' by fe o author of or tho the enforce enforce- t it t act appearing in tho the al il Record last week giving what in tho the minds of or members o of tho the those thee se e e Judiciary committee In 1317 1311 e framing the prohibition amendt amend amend- t 1 iese ese views he be said conflicted with r r statements made mado by various bars of ot both houses In connection th he amendment Mr tr Guthrie also erred t to to- letters written hy by senators ro blY for or the Saloon Anti league nd A. A expressing what they now think Jey el then thought States to io Control Contention W W. Jackson representing the Products company compan took the that b by concurrent power ogress intended intend d that the federal en- en act was to lo be until tale had enacted enforcement legis Mori on lori when tho the latter was to have hav pleto control In enforcing n w within Its borders He also detho de- de Id tho the validity nUdity of tho the t t. t permitting tho the manufacture In ln of ot beer containing 25 5 pert per Cr Crt pt t alcohol which ho contended was wast t Intoxicating i |