Show NEWBERY NEWBERRY CAE CASE ISSUE EXPLAINED Friends of Senator Insist He Did Not Klow Know l Amount Spent in iii Campaign I By Sam Sani Sam Blair Universal Service Staff Correspondent Grand Rapids Mich Michi ch Feb 1 When hen When tho the Jury Jur- which tomorrow will trIll wil begin assimilation of or evidence in the lie case easo of oC United States Stales Senator Truman H. H Newberry and political associates finally renders its is verdict the lie decision presumably will wll be determined upon a simple basis of or technical observance or disregard of the fe federal eral statutes limiting him lim Im- Im campaign expenditures Mr 1 Newberry would not bo be ono one of oC Michigan's representatives In the lie upper legislative O hod body lody were wera ho lie not not a a millionaire ml- ml mil mil- or backed b by Trillions It Is alleged On this ono one point It Is be believed believed be- be Ile ed evidence o of both prosecution and defense will wil n agree ree The government govern govern- go eru ment meat will wi point out through half hat a a thousand witnesses that between half halfa hal a million and a million dollars was spent b by the Newberry campaign committee com corn to present propaganda propaganda ganda Ianda to the time Michigan an voters The defense de de- Ic- Ic tense tenso will wil contend as a Its Is leading already have done that It was WiS canary to spend a large larbe sum ml o of money mone Is the thc total admitted to obtain ob- ob tam aln tain the tle tt defeat of Mr Ir New Newberry's err s widely wide wide- ly I y advertised rival Henry Ford Ford Michigan has a law last backed b by a federal action which limits the campaign cam cam- aign expenditure of at a senatorial candidate can can- cn- cn to less than 1000 Vh Whether this la law aw w is practical ma may be answered cred weeks weel hence when hen tho the Newberry verdict is re returned t u ru etI S The rite successful prosecution of or the lie case caso wIll vill wil depend upon the tho establishment of or orone one ne main point That Mr r. Newberry was WS cognizant of oC the lie expenditure in tho tim Interest of his election lection o of a n greater sum suni than tho the law Hows allows Frank C C. e D Dailey special assis- assis attorney general is convinced that he c can establish this as a fact tact ana aria thereby hereby prove that Senator Newberry and nd his allies were equal equally guilty of or Fundamentally tho the case of ot the dc- dc lensu fens can be reduced to the same samo sim- sim All AU that will wU have ha e to be shown vill wl bo be that that Mr was so 50 busy in his government service at tho the Brooklyn navy yard ard that that ho he gave gao no attention to tho the proSe progress of or his hits campaign cam cain cr- cr and knew absolutely nothing bout about In n his tho the behalf expenditure iuro of or a a single dollar |