Show I BONDS BliNDs FOR ROOF SIGNS CAUSE OF DIFFICULTY I Commission c. c Omits 0 1111 t S to t 0 Require R Them Thein by Ordinance but Re Requires Requires Requires Re- Re I quires Them Anyway I Omission from thu FIr city sign ordinance of a clause c compelling filing of or lon bond l with l for permits to sa save tin the elt city from Crom room dan r of or being the loser through suits suit has caused an I involved In state of at affairs In his imis end of or the city's p business l The ordinance d was I li t ii n nl nf th 1 n i or year Tho rho r now new ordinance I n designed I el to re remove remove re- re I move o front from rom city liability for dent dentI I n ages eJ from falling tailing 81 signs ng and to place all ull responsibility on the owners provided provided pro pro- I vided that all permits 1 Issued expired J I Jon on the first of or the year and that sign I owners must secure a now nei nermit to ha f th the signs In place Though h no imo I bond was mentioned the commission Ihas i ihas has been demanding a n minimum of or 2000 with as hIgh as to required on large signs Bonds already on deposit total 50 hundred other sign Ign owners I Ihan have han received notices to apply for permits per per- mits and furnish bonds and six hundred hundred hun hun- per I dred Irell other notices arc road ready for maji- maji mai- mai lup in time the offices of the tho bull building In- In Thou Then I U It waR wan discovered yesterday yes ves- that the time ordinances do not con inin a ui rd a authorizing ii Lit g t the he I re- re I nl iiii-nl of vf i th IK- IK bond Sign it la Is said pro are rc preparing to lo m make ke a tight a against tho the bond re requirement requirement re- re and anti It Is said 51 nt- nt has ocen employed b by sonic of them tl to look art after r th their lr Interests t The city elt on th the othor hand h has 14 taken the tho matter II up III Informal with n Its legal department 0 o 0 a ascertain ho ho- th the d defect may be remedied j The Tue assertion has b been n made that thal sur surety t- t companies 11 have a 1 t o e re report report re- re port that no bonds Q 8 their own 01 will wll willbe willbe be acceptable to ro th the c commission lon Tho The commission slon last st night adopted a r reso resolution o lotion lution pro l providing ln that p personal lon IR would be just t as acceptable And in inthe inthe I the meantime It Is still a qUN question he commission lon can require any bond n at t all II |