Show UPHOlDS JURISDICTION OF COMMISSION OVER STOCKYARDS Ur u. U S St Supreme Court Reverses Decision of Commerce Co Court u rt Dec 9 Jurisdiction W of ot tho the Interstate commerce commission commission commission com com- mission over the Union Stock Yards Transit company of of- Chicago o toda today was upheld b by the supreme court which sustained tho the commissions commission's rl right ht to using bring suit to have tho company company's s contract contract contract con con- tract to p pay r to Sons puckers for erecting a plant adjacent to Its tracks annulled as amounting toa to toa toa a rebate On the theory theon that Chicago stockyard stockyard stock stock- yard ard business was Interstate commerce the Interstate commerce commission began an un action In tho the commerce court to enjoin the tho Union Stock Yards Transit com company pan the Chicago Junction Railway company compan which operates the tran transit lt company and the Chicago Junction Railways Union Stock Yards company compan which holds the stock of ot theother tho the other two companies from engaging In Interstate commerce until they the had hadI I filed lied tariffs with the commission It also asked to have hae the contract with the firm of ot packers canceled The Tho commerce commerce commerce com com- merce court held that the Chicago Junction Railway company compan alone was engaged In Interstate commerce and so BO so required It to file tile tariffs but dismissed dismissed dismissed dis dis- missed the action as to the tho other com com- panle Justice Day Da- in tn announcing the opinion opinion ion said that tho the commerce court erred in holding that the tho Union Stock StockYards StockYards Yards A k Transit company had exempted exempt exempt- ed Itself from the operation of tho federal federal fed fed- I eral cral law b by le leasing its Itt property to the railway company Instead of ot sending Bending the tho case caso back to toI I the commerce court for tor further r hearIngs hearings hearings hear hear- ings the supreme court directed the lower court to enter a e enjoining f the carrying out of ot the tho contract con con- tract |