Show I S. S P. P SUED IN KENTUCKY FOR Breach of Contract Charged by Development Company of bf Arizona Louisville 28 Because Because the question arose of lack of jurisdiction tion of or the supreme court of ot New York be before before be- be fore tore which was filed about a year ear ago aJo suit for rOl alleged damages for breach of contract a fresh action was brought blought here heie toda today In the United States district court for tor the tile wesl western rn district of Kentucky Kentuck by the Development Develop clop ment merit company of or A America Incorporated In Arizona against the S Southern Pacific Pacific Pacific Pa Pa- company compan Kentucky Kentuck Is the le legal al domicile of or the defendant company Attorneys Attorneys At At- who filed the suit today announced an nn- n flounced the suit in iii New York would be discontinued The Southern Pacific company a- a agreed need to lend the thc development dc company compan OO- OO it Is la alleged in the suit filed tiled to today J but subsequently refused to mal make e the tue loan The rho development company claims that as a n result its credit became so impaired It was unable to protect Its subsidiaries including seven se Arizona mining companies man many of or which h be became became became be- be came bankrupt pt |