OCR Text |
Show TOO BAD. In the last Issue of the Juab County Republican of Eureka, tho "Muu A buii i Town" 1 made, to say. "Interviewed Edward Fuller In regard re-gard to his suit against Jesse Knight & Sons for damage for lJurles received re-ceived whllo In thu employ of the dfendants ut thu Uncle S.mi mine. The jury In tho case after being out everul hours, returned a verdict of "no cause of action." From the statement state-ment of others, however, who wore In attendance a, court during thu trial It would appear that Micro wore two principal reasons why he (Fuller) was defentHd, the first of which Was t h i L the Knignivlile properties are run by revelation strictly aud thai the dominant domin-ant church receives their ten percent tithing romilutly, und thenfnro a Jury compos, d principally of thu members of said church were probably favorable to thu defendants. Tho other reason was thai counsel for thu defsndant in their argument to thu jury dwelled very strongly upon tho fuel that thu plaintiff plain-tiff had endeavored to earn a livelihood by accepting employment as a dealer In u gatnbllnc house since recovering fn.ni the effects of the accident. Whliu It may be cousidett'd gond practice for attorneys to use such niuihods to win a suit, still we uru ut loss to know how our local attorney who was associate cbunsel for the dttfuiisc could afford to spring such A proposition agHlust Fuller, whun he himself bits In the past been known to tussul with thu tiger In a vain endeavor to lucrunse Ins etrthly possesslonst and hjs prlnql-pa.1 prlnql-pa.1 Client, too, In this , case, while he Is too ardent a church member to wagern quut ter on the 'high card or shoot a, dime at a crap gutue, -Is not averse to taking a long chiuce with u thousand or two on u sure thing horse ruce; but then It niakog a"'dlfferonce In thu opinion of some apparently, who ! thu Individual Is, as to what he may I do without being censured." Wo regret to nonce such a publication, publica-tion, We have reason to believe ,t,liat Jesso Knluht & Sons are willing (o'do all in ihVr power to aid their employes and are honest und fair In thulr dealings deal-ings with nil men, Why they should be gtdeetldjforeTifiireJIn "the Just con-ijuut con-ijuut of.ibyir h4Mnor.& yo cannot coi-celve. coi-celve. In ourTasl Issiio we guvtt" the statement of Mr, Jce. Knight to tliu f:fftiCtlfe!lti.I)ltUUU JUCt AlCliU11 4,tt,i of i'uHur aud had dona e ye. ry thing else W...I...J, l1llii.l.l.iM.jAlM . he l)eleVe.-flo b'e hU duty towurd txji injured employee. That Mr. Fuller Violated his part of the agreeincht-ls not I he fault of Knight & Sons. " Because the "dominant church ref celves ten per cent tithing regularly' Is no argument, and as to the cl dm that the Knight properiles "am run by revelaTIon,' we know, and Bodies everyone,. that the properties ;ire rub on tt btMlness bash. This class of argu-moiit argu-moiit (?) and lhrtliendd wo' regard' us entirely nut of place end It Is too bad tt is rc50rted til by reputable newspapers. |