Show constantine bill BY BOARD would defeat very purposed purpose present law chic 0 ea 44 districts on k I f boards of adu hilj that the provision revisions p or of no 18 introduced by representative constantine of grand county and re centar killed in tho the legislature legi liture wert impracticable inconsistent with w shed plans of government unfair ta certain portions of 64 gram county school district and portion portions of tho the school districts district i afier ally throughout the stall Is j the opio ion of the members of the boa boar A dof d deduc education aaion of grand county az aw brict this was evidenced evidence counti th II 11 04 by a letter fetter signed by 0 A J 11 miller howard W gaill cyM S W dufford of tho grand couty board of addressed to representative of the letter was sent to tho the hour house committee on education the letter of protest which wai was represented to reflect tho sentiments of trustee wm 11 II muller of castleton ni as well wall AS the other members of the board was called forth by the tb statement of mr constantine lne at the time the bill was killed that ho he would reintroduce it t in the legislature the bill cave gave to voters throughout th the county A school c hool districts district a of the first class the 0 o right to vote for members of the b board oard of education from each of the several school representative precincts of tho the county ing tho the law require requires the aviv I 1 bers of the board to 0 J certain ara of the county di liiri air ct which ordinarily contains roughly rough yf 8 per r cent of the population of tho ent tire r e c county 0 u n t y alit it is tho unanimous opinion of th tb members of the board the letter letti ta t mr constantine states that tho present plan of eloc electing ting f the board of education from school representative precincts throughout the county is desirable and satisfactory as assuring all parts of the coun ty representation in the school gove rement and for this reason prefer able to the ejection election of the member members of the board from the county district at large if this betrue then it would seem impracticable and tending to defeat the very purpose of the representative precincts to permit the voters from other sections of the county than tho the precinct represented to elect the member ef of the board from such precinct for example in it i this county where the m majority tt oaty of of the tie voters reside at 0 or r I 1 in n the vicinity of azember of the board ithe residents of elgin pre precinct elnett lit 0 A mm her ber oRtis satisfactory factory t to the roii reil dents of castleton pr precinct edrict 90 00 per cent of the votes of hie his representative 1 precinct and yet be defeated by voters af of other precincts of the coati ty 1 this coridi condition tion i tolfa is to both the elgin and mind castleton precincts I 1 in this cout county ity and we believe a very similar condition exists at green river in emery coutv coun perhaps in many of the counties majority ft of the voters of the couitt school dis reside in some particular portion of 49 A county it would seem un fair to tv outlying precincts to ham er as would result irbe the legi legis ration kr lion proposed their choice of their representative on the board of education the plan to require as a t alon on for membership on the boitt boadt of education the letter ahat the member reside a precinct of the county and ww yet to wo vide that voters throughout the court ty may vote for or against him 1 it is obviously inconsistent with our esteb dished methods of government rovern meriL we might with as much propriety vote in grand county for the representative to the Jogi slature from san joan ro emery county countr or vote in the first congressional district for the depte tentative senta tive to congress from the 9 aw n d district or tor for that matter utah for the governor of col Co lorady ara d 6 as to vote vota at moab for the chaW trustee from prid who 1 is reside within elgin or castleton te is |