Show CASE As every indication points to the re cobery of the the attention of lawyers and tho generally seems to be directed towards tho assassin and district attorney CorL hills movements it is the intention of the district attorney to indict and try the on two attempts upon the the president and in view of this alleged movement attorney corkhill is receiving the views of many of the most popular lawyers in the east who deem tho mo ement a just one that guiteau premeditated the is now considered positive his conduct in prison and manner prior to the attempt together with his pedigree voluntarily given by his is sufficient evidence evid enco that he is a dangerous character guiteau shot a second time he admits it because he saw that his first hot with intent to kill had failed and thought 1 somewhat tedious as will be the pio riess of the trial the people will all hail with joy his conviction and execution foi id an interview with ym A beach an eminent criminal crimi nil lawyea who cites from bishops law authorities which will doubtless aid the wash ayton district attorney in his an indictments bishop il seems in sections and of his treatise says the doctrine of the section buforo the last goes far to the general doc trine that a man las couo a criminal thing the prosecutor may carve as large an out of the transactions as he can yet ha aust cut only once and if we receive this proposition w ath the understand ing the man may do several distinct criminal things in succession and even bythe same act provida pro no one the same ground as for each of which he Is separately it stems a just doctrine yet the Is but imper factly supported at least but benned denned by the authorities thus a vcr mont court held that where the same blow bounded two men a conviction for the a tault and battery charged to ITC been committed on one of them was a bar to an indictment for it was committed on the other and in borth carolina chero ther was a duty to leap the streets of an ancor town in repair and several indict menti were fondd on the same day for breach es of this duty in respect to as lauy streets it was decided ft conviction on one would bar proceedings on the others on the other hand probably the english and some other of the american tribunals w decide the other way in cases like both the aft 0 mentioned ones an anglish judge even laid down the doctrine that where man stole at one time two pigs belonging to the sime person he might first be convicted of the larceny of one pig and aftem ards of the larceny of the other and if tho alga be lunged persons there would be american authority the same way but there Is plainly a limit to the light of mul indictments for the alon though we may not easily say what the limit is |