OCR Text |
Show WEBER AGlSf 1 AMENDMENT T Although Disapproved Here, Majority Votes for More Schooi Funds Although Wabec and Salt Lake counties voted overwhelmingly against tho prbpoaed amendment to the constitution con-stitution known as amendment No 2, providing Increased school funds throughout the state. L J- Muir. state superintendent of public Instruction, siatd yesterday thai lie believed the amendment carried by a majority of ! nearly 10,000. Returns from uli counties coun-ties of the suite ai not complete, but Information go far available indicates Ithe amendment inei with popular j-p- proval in an ouimiuc uuiuaicn exception of Weber and Salt Lake Letters ami telegrams received yesterday yes-terday gave lh r.-sult.s in several counties previously unheard from. Among the counties reported was Uu-ehesne. Uu-ehesne. the voters of which favorjjd the amendment by isor. voie.s, only seventy-.eighl being cast against i i i intah county. rl(H votes favored tiie amendment and 104 opposed Is. Iron county gave the atXiMnatlVi 1452 and the negative 101 votes. In San Juan county 15 J votes were for the amendment and eight against it. Rich county gave Z JO for mid '.''ir, .itziinsf. In Juab th- figures were reversed, re-versed, Z'-'G opposing the amendment and 190 favoring It. In Bmef) county the vote was almost solidly In favor of the proposition, it Is said. Washington Washing-ton countv gave a total of H44 for the amendment and 60 against it. Sevier Se-vier county vote. i L'iS.". for and 227 agninst. Carbon county registered i plurality of 199 for the amendment. In Ix)gan there was a majority of I' I iv Beaver, Cache and Davis COUQtteS have riot reported their respective votes. Emery Is said to he almost unanimously In favor of the affirmative. affirma-tive. Garfield and Kane coUntles were strong In OX pressing approval' and slight majorities arc rephrted from Morgan and Summit counties. A rather even vote was cast in Piute county |