OCR Text |
Show existing intormation tint! where needed, collect addi- l I tional information appropriate to the decision to be i i made. I 3. Develop decision criteria based upon laws, regu- Jan. 1981 j j lation, policy, and issues. This is a very important I step as criteria will be used as the basis to select the preferred alternative plan. 4. Analyze the ability of the Forest to supply goods March 1981 and services in response to public needs. How well the Fishlake N.F. has met these needs in the past will be part of this analysis. Yes 5. Formulate a range of alternatives that will pro- June 1981 vide a variety of ways to resolve the public issues, management concerns, and resource development opportunities identified in step No. 1 . 6. Examine and predict the physical, biological, July 1981 economic, and social effects of implementing each alternative. Effects upon Forest resources and the local and state economics are important. 7. Evaluate alternatives in terms of their effec- Sept. 1981 tiveness in meeting the final decision criteria. Yes 8. Publish a Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dec. 1981 which will indicate a preferred alternative for public review. Yes 9. Publish a Final Environmental Impact Statement Aug. 1982 and implement the selected alternative. N Affected Area; u It THE NEW REGULATIONS CONTAIN STRINGENT RE- l QUIREMENTS FOR THOSE WISHING TO APPEAL A FOREST PLAN. APPLICANTS MUST SHOW THAT ; THEY PARTICIPATED IN THE PLANNING PROCESS AND PREVIOUSLY RAISED THE SPECIFIC ISSUES U THAT THEY ARE CHALLENGING. J j flj SANPETE FILLMORtTJ J J4 ( "V,"N j s" r j Wichfiild p I j J f ' fjrjl v 1 E R I 0 I J f f( IWAYNE UlAVtZ J) nUNCIIoTT I j Supplement to The Beaver Press, The Beaver County News, Millard County Chronicle, Millard County Progress, The Gazette, The Salma Sun, The Richfield Reaper, Rooster Valley Shopper. ' |