Show JURY ithal become fashionable to ridicule binl decry our present ly system as blat ia 1 to tho progressive spirit of the nac alio great complaint is that in tho great majority of cases tho qualifications of trial jurors anro too low tho 01 of or tho capricious and wayward humors eliat sway them ran deriu alio of a trial little bt than 1 lottery charges aio in u measure amt too true for tho existing statute a auy nian aliat lia lias s over of ft notorious case thron gli tho pubic prieta or elsewhere ia cou alc to serve as si m on that particular case thin placing alie ou us of mi allo oil for iii stanco upon a jury of aion who never read anything ciul arc consequently to be matoil among tho unintelligent aln of society that should bo audgo of amo points of law and of the reliability of testimony is without a of jurisprudence but on the other hand alio system la tho best educator of hiir laboring and quondam juryman that cmaj bo conceived of for matters not how unintelligent hia previous life hag boon after ho lias passed tho ordeal of being a petit juryman for 1 term aud lias been the prey of the eloquence of the av crago lawyer lio becomes intellectually awakened and hom h om that timo it his duty to become conversant tho api cpi boies of the day destroying by this course his fuluio usefulness as a juryman so that notwithstanding all that is said against it it lias ii good points and in fact with allias glaring faults no other machinery has ever been dovis cl that does not contain just as serious defects as this system of selecting a trial j ury |