OCR Text |
Show BBflflJ jJ I 0T EXACrLY SO. )' L A Tuc Dcmex-at. of Washington, . II D. C, h?s a brief editorial on the MM "Mormons" anl pollt'cs In Idaho ?K and Wyomlnr. It la curt and to BBBBBJ ': j g the point, but is slightly mixed ith VflVfll 1 Vm error. The "Mormons" of Wyom- flflflflflm A Rf ing are neither all Democrats nor all flVflKflf , Jk ' aim Republicans, and the same may t flflfljflfl wB m! J of tt2Clr c-rtl!K"onltts In Idaho. Sjflflflflrv .'flB What editors do not know about the BbHVBbV' SPKm "Mormons" would make xoviral flflflflflj'A f VW luge and Interesting libraries. Ihe flBBBB i fa JfemoomtsiyK bB'4' 1 !B. bbbbV tf jbI '9lfl BBBBBj 'ty AjE IBbK BB flflflw .ssflfli "The fact that the Republicans polled a Urge vota In tho Mormon connties of Wyoming creates no surprise. sur-prise. The Wyoming Mormons were known to bo Republicans when the SUte was admitted, with a constitution constitu-tion that gave women the right to vote, and tho Idaho Mormons were known to bo Democrats when that State was admitted, with a constitution that dls franchifed all Mormons, male and female. Republican rules never work both ways. |