LADY bulwer LYTTON ox ON tiri thi wroy capr in all ali a a judge could not hate have b ate are to decide as the chief taran did in the thi recent case of johnson versus sil sumner iner that if a husband had bad a year ie is enough for the wife a tariff that gab gas if as always been practically carried out in ich IcA moral loral england ay but now it is judicially proclaimed proal aim alm ed from the house tops and this is the of that blasphemous juggle ithe the matrimonial causes bill pano but as save in the exceptional case of etl eti L gancy gano 11 no good ever can proceed from corruption allwoo know the source of the matrimonial causes cau efa eia bill I 1 III ili cannot be surprised at of iniquity which may arise from it the most moat direct of which will be that women will not henceforth even evex have have the forlorn hope hod of the verdict ofa of a jury for now that this poisoned and treacherous drous orous ecclesiastical olive branch has hag been extended to them the tiie temple of janus at Lincol ns inn lin and ana westminster hall will wiil be bo more hermetically closed than ivet iver ever and horsehair and humbug reig viii autocratic triumph tri trl I 1 I 1 then than as ta a sort of or far fan fance farce ceto to the tragedy traced y of 0 the matrimonial causes bill though preceding it in date comes cornea the n next at great legal juggle of the ane age over overla v the same hierarchy as the divorce billj bill chami namely the law amendment So society clety 6 of which by allowing female B to be responsible for their own contracts bce stows on them an entity which mauei makei mak mau ei them amenable to prison incarceration a glorious glor gior lous ious P privilege legel iegel they were de barred from under the old system of honest injustice Bit but article articie I 7 contains the pith and mairow marrow of the whole affair affa 1 i and Is the concentrated quintessence of that virtue morality and exemplary e equity for which some of the presiding magnates nag nates famed for it provides provi dek dei that a husbands nus bus bands hands liabilities shall not elc ell exceed eid ei eod d the amount of f fortune he had bad with his bis wife e I 1 so that if a man with a year marries a girl who though accustomed to every luxury has nothing and at his bis pleasure aa as is tha the fashion in ill moral england be chooses to kick her off lie be keeps his hi s a year yean to wallow r in n every vice and 1911 Is able liable for nothing towards the h e su support ap pp J of a woman who who nho bad nothing or if bhe she he bad only or a year he is only liable to that thit amount out of his which at once reduces the whole swindle brindis to the Chief barons iniquitous areto oh ob women of engi engl england and ar turned out to grass the better bettor for far are beasts of burden the tle world anz and hig his ftfe or a person of consequence Conse quene queue jl photo phalo novell by lady lytton bulwer Bult buit ctr oer