GARLET CARLET WOMAN I t r LOSE GROUND I I 1 J Ir d to b be Present in Court I J I i And Anti Enter Pica Plea to Nine I I 0 j i I f h Charges If tt tI II l to I f GO TO TRIAL TOMORROW j r 4 1 I I M I Will VIII ho III I JulIa diu I I J r i ti II I III An rf Ills Illi IlliA t A i I Of 0 t J II IIi I t i r r aw 11 lii cI Atty n JI J Dummy won all of I I m SJ I 1 I ICi P r i 1 I thu 1111 morning III in hi hl 4 1 i L S I 1 It Ihl hi Hello l and the hIl Ihei ji t i l t dull ii Die I lie of ot Halt Itt t I 1 Ii oko 1 ruler of II wan WH not lulL only c m 11 t i n JI I j be I In lii tho Milled court lIrt t I j r I 11 II 1 r plea II lii nf fI I If not hilt 1 guilty I ty to 10 nine Ine III i I c lr I IH H entered but hall had lo La to 10 thu Ih I 14 i mm II lIPI 1111 et for hr Immediate le hearing huru r f M I It I I I i n 1 tint to 10 begin tomorrow I Ii 1 i I I every loophole of o the tIm laws 1 ir rj I C Ill II Iu II 11 und and resorting to tu over lIVer Ii I II d 4 I I Ick ILk of o de ICIS and HII 1111 dilatory tactics 1111 I III 11 I I I 1 i for tor the thu defendant Mr Dora Doru DoraTo 1 iV 4 j i I 1 To 11 1 i Imin ullas Hell halls London and still andr stillI I n l i 1 r the Koreans Hut ii 1 i ml 1 and H H Ii I Le ce wa WItS denied In turn lun It I I P rj red ni fill I IOns nH Cull I ISI have like mount C Ci jl i i v j o lay IR fl III In the I h tu bringing of if r the till i lISPS Hien 11 to 10 II IIIi I J Ii il t i 0 1 Ii I An tt II Ill Tt tt I the I lit SlIPS d 1141 dt I I 4 r IIII time 1111 I I In III C II Jill 1011 1 III 11 Isal IH futile U Cl t 1 I II I J e V I nine iii churn glI liNt fbi ell 10 Pt tu I I d f I I e for f or ir routing renting O for Immoral I i jJ I l Il II tIll fuir r for or violating 1115 Chit the j II 1 f I i IlL 1 no lIer IVere re set net 1 by h b Judg JutIe I 4 n 4 41 4 i III II for tir ur hearing bogi n II 11 lung III It IJo i I w v Tho 1111 of at atI r violating I i I I liquor Ilor ordinal brought t l d I rh eli or JI I Ii of ot tile the Ih 1 j j will I ill follow those thOMI tile Dig Il ji r t 01 I I q 1 r i t INFORMATION ANI NI 4 4 j 1 I i I I The fill aO Ik III up the KrAlI I i IC of o tho 1111 Ih In lii Judge How Hw t L 1 i iI n i fourt the time 11 being ting devoted rI z i fly to I Ii ft LII Un Oil the Ih I motion 1111 1 t I q I by li b th till s il i fi I I to Ill have ilave h the Ih warrant of 01 I 1 c f r F I ii aft MCI a alde In the Chic varIous ff III si I I t I il Ii M Mr II tIle the theu th thi lI i t u on n 11 tile the I 10 mill that the Ih I l I ii In ta w is ci on all Information I ii jolt r I f I I il 1 belief 1 only jill y full not hut on III I III IIII i I j I I I J JudICe ruled HI 1411 r 8 I C ri to to the Ih Tile The court held Ih ir it I I lit jit the tI lie Ir In III the lie II if r I C 1 I i duty dUI 1 II n 1114 I u roil to 10 act a cC upon a i I I p belle or r of lit n the Cite com orn k Jt 1 4 J 11 ii I Sulon I of ot a II or felony ony I I I II I the deprivation iI of till Ihl hue power e I I I i Mild hi It In hi I n It wh state I I Ally 11 tty Culbert U I Oleen nn for I the Ihl df lIe 1 IJ I t I fine was wan wn prepared with two twit Iw othor I f 1 i I 1 11 one III till for or n II of or orr II i t I dee I nIl the lIP Ih I MI for faIr or u a I ella go of at 1 r j i 1 I i UI ii tho he Ih t In III u Cloth both lot tune tin t I t I 4 tho Ih belief of ot the Ih defendant that I I r i I I I could 1 1111 not nol have 1110 n II fair stat and 11 Impartial i 1 I 1 8 I pi Iii li of ut the I h lilac ii till prejudice lee lm Ii II I the court After both bolh I C t I i Ij J 1111 t Ill IN were denied I I ii Ll i I p I flocked In lii the Ih attempt to 10 delay I t t i ii II ii mn It Ii 11 the th Ih ISIl II com 1 I I j It Ull to tip It tinder the tI ii I t I I I l It ludKe lo nian Hint the I li II I 1 11 I II anti lImo thu Ko Io Koan I o oId I 1 t 1 I II an l ho hI e present In lii c jurt Juri when the I Y Id fl i I I 1 wan waif MrK lra WH f Th t t I j i nt I for or nr und find during the 1111 Ih entering of off Ii I f plea ia II lit ut not nol guilty wit sat I h her hr Cl 1 P j I Iho he railing of ot the po pop I p Q 1 I p f courtroom III tl nn an object I of It o ItI I I I l to tn the thO tb sitting on fin the tho th theil il I r i ni III Iby by Il bench I Ii IJ TO TUY TH WOMAN MAN 1 I I i i I Ilk i In the tIli Ih setting netting or of tile the Ih HO 1 I p III ii i led tilt ii I La up Ul U l and 14 Ion un one oil or b j i Ii I IU ii i Ills Atty tl t C Olsen Olien lout be C tile bin bina t p 1 I 4 pP a II VI t lut I I C II III 1 appeared B r d nettled Its It lid II f J r wanted the Ih trIed I l I a n procedure to tip which AfI t elty Ii tI 1 ly 11 I II In III IIII haI I I I I hItting Unit n nIl them thes Ih 1 wIe t I Ir I p 4 lue CC of fir IF the prim I ml defendant CiP era ert re might be he a R motive 1111 In Iii tho I lie III fl l the th Mi Mr 1 Dalton suggested J 1 I tho court hut thol under the Ih plan of ot th the I tile the Ih of 1 the Ih nine cases case t tI I ii t Hello 1111 I Ith It London would be lie called cc 1 n rIley HUd 11 1 that they Ih would lie ha 10 taken I p 1 Kiln l Iii with II I ut II date After their the Hie II 1 1 f tea es of o the Ih or would be If call C Sir lr r UI II asked that Ihal the tle tearing hearing of t I f 10 go aI a over until at lit leant ACId tU I I My 4 1 that Ihal he lie h would I 1 all ah 61 jt from fici ii the th ILy It aping d all a ii of at f I II I r k Mr II Ir r I lion un II how hov h w I fr t that tIit the CIa tJ rune eases be b Mt st t for Ur eaily I nl nettled Mr J I lavil l n offered to 10 leave IR the setting netting to In top Ini i p 9 curt court Judge Jud promptly 1 the hearing no On I Gill H 1 eel eelI t tf I A f cn flU fur for ur tomorrow I o I l hip hla hI argument Mr Dalton urged at RI urgent exist for rr the IbM early 1 of thIs the en H the lie partIcular one ne on oni neI I i bur lii jig the I he fin Cor I of f th lb law 11 nn ns nn so soI I t I the 11 II lion Inn end and a nit the Ih mint In Is I II Isit it 11 the violation of this the Ih taw Ia riled cited 1 In Iii Ini 1 i 15 In Is I still III being 1 curried I I Ift liI n 4 1 i Mr SIr Ir Oln Oleen to I hK the I nd of at II the th ICO fixed at WO un If cc 1 t er r ach h K n tu total of 4 I I 00 for tor or N defendant t but hilI buti l tit II 7 ils i I II ae refused refund 1 r Mr lIr olsen linen 01 bluntly In InI i I I m the Ih Ir that Ihal un the th thi i n nl w tried 11 heat 1 ti he t I j i 1 right to 10 a g motion that j I J iii further d oIla la the th of I till the til tilI all f I I site CP Ii l I