Show DURAND IS MADE Charges of Irregularities ir in Procedure of Murray S Justice VISIT WAS FILED BY LUKE Defendant In tho Action Was AVns Not Served e l With lIh Summons Before Judgment Was vas ns Entered Charles F. F Durand Murra Murrays Murray's s notorious OU nu ous justice of or the peace was made the defendant a again yesterday In a Il suit filed In lith the Third District court asking to for l' l a t. t writ of or prohibition In tho the cal case o of or I. I H. H Cook against P. P C. C Barrett Judgment was entered against P. P C C. Barrett in favor of or L I. II H Cook for in iri Justice Durands Durand's court on ona onn a n promissory note Issued It el eight ht years ago for on February 16 16 1900 1906 Francis G. G Luke manager of the Merchants Merchants' Merchants Merchants' Merchants Merchants' Mer Mer- chants' chants Protective association med lliel tho the suit in Durands Durand's court Charges of Irregularities In the proceedings proceedings proceedings pro pro- of or the case and the nature of tho the testimony Introduced are made In tho the complaint The defendant Inthe in inthe inthe the action was not served with a summons summons summons sum sum- mons before Judgment was entered In Inthe inthe the tho case The Tho testimony before the court was supplied b by tho the plaintiff In inthe tho the action Following th the Judgment a writ of or garnishee was served upon th the lie Union railroad company for Barretts Barrett's wages Barrett Darrett is working for tho company at Green River flyer Wyoming The wages ages for tor tho the months of or July and anci August belonging to Barrett Barrett Bar Bar- rett have have been tied up UI and he asks for a t. t writ prohibiting Durand with proceeding proceeding- further with the case ontiE until until un un- J til tiE a settlement nt of or the tho case filed flied yes yes- es Barrett delivered to Cook Conk a promissory promis promis- sor nary sory note in 1898 1838 for the first premium on an Insurance policy The Tho policy p was never Issued to Barrett Barett and he ho asked ked that th the note be cancelled Cook held the note noto for seven years yeni a before he turned It over for collection The Th attorneys have investigated the affair and declare that Cook has no claim on the tho note His Ills company compan did not issue the policy and anI therefore the note nole- is void ol 1 It t is further stated by hy the attorneys for Barrett that Cook did not turn the noto note In to tho the local office cAke of the thc company and attempted to tomake tomake tomake make the collection for his personal benefit |