U U. I P. P Plan Departure From I. I Former orner Methods l Under Antitrust Law Lar Washington June 30 Scarcely Scarcely had publicity been given to the tho govern govern- approved ment plan for dissolution be before before be- be fore roro comment commont was heard upon Its re reflection ro- ro of tho the attitude of ot Attorney General towards the tho trusts It was generally recognized that the plan marked a a. distinct departure In Inthe Inthe inthe the dissolution of offending corporations corporations corpor carper under the tho Sherman antitrust law Particularly was the plan compared corn com pared with the Standard Oil 01 and Tobacco Tobacco To To- bacco dissolution decrees Supporters of ot the administration pointed out that the plan avoided the mistakes es of tho ho former dissolution de decrees do- do o- o crees In that It made mado It Impossible for fOl forthe forthe the stockholders to exert the restraints on trado trade forbidden en to tho corporation In tIme the Standard 01 Oil and Tobacco de decrees decroes de- de I croes crees they said the stockholders wore left leU free tree to hold stock In tho the rival corpora corporations corporations cor cor- pora lons which succeeded the tue parent paren t corporation thus effecting a dissolution dissolution I tion ton only In name and that what tho the offending corporation did before the thed d decree creo the tho stockholders had been doIng doIng doing do- do Ing Ing since the decree It I was wa declared that the difficulty of or tho the stockholders holders acting In unison has not been boen sufficient surl- surl cleat clent to bring about the competition among tho the subsidiary companies companIes