THAT QUESTION OF roli Y certain orators of utah anil and idaho express 0 great indignation 0 over r the remark of a republican recently published in this paper the gentleman said in tanco that thai a republican victory at this critical time might satisfy some personal spite bai but it mi might 0 lit also do utah great injury bec because luse of certain measures now pending in con congress ress but this policy argument is not such sch a new thing to our friends of the other side in ill the third ward meeting house on oil the 3rd ard of march 1892 similar sentiments were expressed showing that as tho the republican party was in power the people should be republicans too if they expected any favors from the government now the tables are arc turned and the democratic party parly is in full control of every branch of tho the government and our Republic republican on friends no longer think the policy argument t applicable or proper the speaker who introduced that style of argument in comlin 0 and cache county two years ago was wag a distinguished republican 0 of salt lake city who was particularly conspicuous in logan during the the other city campaign ile he used the policy argument in other oilier places be bc bides the third ward of this city but his speech there was iris reported and published and wo we have it ready to reproduce if it is demanded ni the speech of mr geo F gibbs gibbe was the event of the evening march 3 1892 ile he explained that it was necessary for there to be two parties our troubles have come from oui ou unity in politic iett as dinst instanced aniced in the idaho troubles ts when so s o many anti mormon measures were before congress a year or so ago certain business men of salt lake and ogden went east and assured the people that there was it a hope for the territory to become republican the the mormon teaching leaned toward that doctrine thus they had a good D fighting D chance it was on account co of these assurances that these matters pending iri in congress were pigeonholed pigeon holed it is our business to be divided we might as well be all peoples party men as to be all democrats it is the policy to be divided that we ire may get our rights if the democratic party was in power it would not admit utah unless it was democratic republicans will not not admit utah un unless less it is republican would it not be folly to all rush into one party that is why we should go in fur for tile the men on top and not bother with a dead do dog the republican party started out with a platform pledged to destroy slavery and polygamy and were pledged 0 to this policy the democrats were not so committed because it was not in their platform the speaker eaid that when tin oil division came democrats tool took time by the forelock and intimated that they had taken advantage T ot republic republicans cans in this way but tin tb people were ivere beginning to see no nou wal what it varty party was iu in lower ower and h b would not hesitate to predict that the political situation has com fenced to be changed 0