Show SOME OF FRANKS MISTAKES when mr cannon was baj in lo 10 loann an a year and a half ap ago he be said that the mckinley tariff on sugar was only four tenths of a cent a pound and he dramatically declared before a large audience that prof paul had lied but only a little lio lie in laying the tax was half balf a cent the tax was ivas and is half a c CIA cent per pound so it was frank that had lied if only a little lie to to use his own words Il holding a book before him which lie he said was the mckimley McK ioley law lit he had deliberately inis misstated stated the facts in order to ta make inake out that prof paul had ad lied as lie ho haid baid to the audience on that occasion profi prof paul proved from official 1111 figures res that american refined sugar is lold kold iu in Liv crool at 3 31 to 1 41 l cents per pel pound not to bo outdone out done frank whipped out a telegram 0 direct from the refinery in brooklyn rooklyn ri which eaid the price of refined sugar engar in this country is only per sack I 1 not only so eo but be had also asserted that ever since the lehi factory began operations operation the freight on tugar sugar to utah is only fity cents a hundred lie ile thus proved from his famous or infamous anions telegram and from his reckless unfair statement about freight that the people of utah get sugar at it per sock sack sugar is now and was then over per sack eack as aa hie big opponent had asserted on that occasion prof p paul jul asked aske prank dFrank this question will not the sugar factory go right W on without the territorial bounty dramatically whipping cl a letter from his pocket the lion frank J y read an offer of to the man who could show how the factory could be run a single year without the territorial bounty well a democratic legislature was elected no bounty wits was granted and the factory has been running smoothly and beautifully ever since ince on oil that occasion this question was put to frank if we pay a bounty of two cents on sugar and tile the sti sugar 0 ar is then sold in idaho where no bounty is pa paid id will not lot idaho people get utah sugar sugar 0 just two cents per pound cheaper clie aper than we ve get it to which he be replied with lofty scorn why no they will pay six cents for tho the sugar just as we do and though 0 we will pay two cents more in bounty making 95 eight cents that the sugar cost us ue nevertheless since wo we get from them six cents in money for each pound of sugar 0 which has cost coat us eight 1 cents centi to pro produce lupy jowill wo vie will get I su cents c the best 0 oi alere cleres is a man then 0 t it lit n a I 1 that an article costin costing 2 1 utah eight cents to pro produce dace and selling in idaho for six cents represents eserts a gain of six cents to utah As the boys say this is rich on oil the same occasion he asserted that sixty million dollars in money money went abroad yearly to buy sugar alone when the official figures for twenty years were ivere spread before him showing that he had mis quoted them lie he responded in a subsequent sube quent speech that under the operation of the mckinley TIc kinley law whatever might have been the case previously we export more than we import and andraid said lie we do receive the balance in gold the facts are exactly the reverse of what lie he in the face of a large audience e alleged a them to be and lie he knew it the official figures show that in three years of the operation of tho the mckinley law our loss of gold old lias has reached the enormous 9 total of over lie ife no doubt thought his audience would never decover di cover that lie had misread the law imposed upon his hearers with a grapevine telegram 0 and reversed official figures 0 that he might seem to make a point at that moment lle he played his hia followers for suckers and they took the bait in in blissful i ignorance norance of how low grossly lie he had misled them why he stopped slopped just short of telling 0 them the mo moon oil is make of green c heese cheese we cannot imagine unless lie ile judged that thero there is somewhere a limit to the credulity of partisans |