1 NU NO MERCY WilL VILL WilLBE BE BEHON SHOWN RUEF I Ir I II r 1 T Tit it Jj Alleged Alleg d Prosecution Will Revenge i H Itself Upon Him for Reversal R versal tl I y Of Conviction of BE TERRIBLE EXAMPLE r it t ik That District At Attorney tt W h j torney With K x i ff fik HuM HuMi i L San an Francisco J 10 That the tho fj k N J In n tho th eases rases f t Y n endeavor or lo to It elt upon Up ll Abraham ll for tor or the re vernal by b tho appellate court of ot the th conviction or ot former Mayor chmItz on 01 charge or Ot extortion and nullifying all Uti the th extortion indictments t t by hy all alt Immunity to tol the l t former political boss boa and by prose prosecuting i him him on enough of or the Indictments l returned against him Iti to toj j rid 4 Insure In III cd calC cae e of conviction what would I bo ho practically a life liCe sentence r cn though It wore were found necessary to ill iho op all 1111 tho the other cases cn tho th statement made mado to the tho Associated i tonight by b l a 11 L person closely clo l ly Iden Identified 1 titled with HAD BAD FAITH The Ih prosecution c was charged with r wIth and alii It was wati wusI I that tho the district attorneys of ot fleo 0 was wa to visit vl lt Its It defeat detent i i t upon pon this tho th former political dictator and companion of et by making him bini hime e scapegoat t for Us Its failure after utter It IL had promised r him hini at ot partial for tor the Information he lie had im parted IJ In his lila Coming as It Jt did at the tho end ot of a II day dayot of ot mystery and u ul silence which enshroud enshrouded ed tho th movements und and activity ot of both the tha prosecution and and und a n noh oh conference be tty y William Landon Special Agent W iv V J Burns und anti Hiler at the formers house following continuance until Tuesday of ot the tho cases against Patrick Calhoun C lh y L 1 Furd Fun Mullaley William M I Abbott and i Jd with bribery In con eon connection with the tho United railroads trolley which cams came up betor Su Superior Jud Lawlor Lawior this morning Hunt to the ot of tho the district attorney ney fley nt at the tatters request When bo ho emerged two t hours litter later neither he nor Langdon would jIve the slightest Inti Intimation mation what the of the confer conference confert ence 1100 t ue was wai but bitt It was wa later hater learned that was severely and aini that tho thio results were satisfactory to neither sIde bide AND A D THE nUe proceeded to Temple Israel where he was for an hour with I Jacob bUeto and iu Bernard Dornald Kap Kup f Ian Jou aft In order that thit It might not lol l b bS V S troy tray his hla hI presence he ordered hU au an to proceed around the tho block tt and wait walt fur tor him It was learned that thata ye a n break hind had occurred between ii and the tho prosecution and that the tho dh J attorney vM was I In no mood to toni tern h with nue any loncer lonor rho Tho lat hat latter lalif hattee if tee ter stilted that the district attorney desired d another conference with him Th 7 next Monday Monda A II i of tho prose prosecution r cution Ution remarked significantly thy h will bo lie tractable ble enough when vinn we wc get through thi rOugh with will ivi t U him While the reversal by tho Iho appellate court co wn on tim tho appeal al of It former Major 1 cir it has hud hail the effect of or making Ruf the central fig lg ure ono one and one mistrial of or Tirey IryL L Ford JFord having caused the tho prose prosecution i roso cution to practically concede that testimony li III essential to conviction In thi th tl s caMS cae also oTho declined to make a statement today but butt It t was wa announced tonIght by yone one ot of othis his Ills attorneys that application lot for tho the release of ot the orator former mayor on ball bail would bo be made tomorrow morning COUNSEL DISAGREE It developed during tho the day da that t counsel for tor and Ruef Ru t rind the district attorneys office disagreed on Whether or not the tho judgment of ot tho the appellate court can be effective at or not until tint 10 SO days utter lifter the decision was vat handed down The defenso defeno o main maintains that undo under I a statute In 1003 1905 1 0 a must be b sent lent down by bytho tho tile higher court forthwith which us n pointed out by tho the prosecution pl tI m IB itt In Indirect Indirect direct conflict with tho the constitutional con provision that Jud judgment ment cannot go BO Into mt Int effect or a Ii remittitur be bo sent down until after aHel 30 except with the con consent consent sent Bent of the tho people Another question ovar which there Is li lia Isa isa a difference of or opinion between the tho law lawyers lawyers for fr or the two sides oldell Is la whether or not bond hand of was exon exonerated orated when he was Wall convicted If It hold held holdby by the th court that t It was Wait not Riot tho the tor for former flier mer r mayor will only have to t 0 put Ut up an additional bond for tor tho the ball ban upon the theNne nine prizefight trust Indictments re to returned returned turned by the UH Oliver grand jury Juit before J It was na discharged last month m Some ot of the of ot the tho prosecution prosecution tion declared tonight that application for tor ball tomorrow morning will Hill bo be refused on the tho that no has 1108 been belI returned by hy the thc appellate con court COUlt it and that officially tho thu trial court Is III not aware awara of or tho the reversal rove I Should a II remittitur bo be sent down It Is said suld that Its KB legality would bo be attacked It was vas also asserted lIs that tho the pro cu thou will not ask the tho appellate court COUlt for forn a rehearing of the tho appeal apPl to o tako take an rin rinn appeal n pol from Its It II decision to the tho court S