Show CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PLAINTIFF AGAINST CITY ANk k Judgment ut for for tor- Sidewalk SIde SIde- walk Work or A Vork Claims Job Joli Was 0 Not Finished As a a- sequel to lon long continued controversy controversy controversy con con- with the city over Its Improvement Improvement Im Im- Im- Im provement contracts tho the Consolidated Construction company compan yesterday tiled filed suit In the tho district court against Salt Suit Lake to collect for sl sidewalks and e extra tra work do dents dono no at tho Instance of ot th the e cl city t The rhe company became Involved In fl fl- financial difficulties some time ago o and accor according to the city failed to complete com corn two or three sidewalk contracts I As a result the city refused to pay company Yesterday Yes te rd a a re representatives p res e nta t I yes o of oC f tI the tho i ci I company held a n. conference with tho tIme commissioner of or streets the engineer the attorney and other ell city officials As a result tho the city decided to hol hold holdback holdback back Jacle all tho the money claimed aa at due to cover cost of completing unfinished contracts and engineering engineering- work as ns aswell well vell as materials No 0 trouble at all to nave navo a benu beautiful aul aulI garden s wh when n you ou plant seeds I Advertisement d 1 |