Show A REHEARING DENIED The iJist llnpp or thc tJsiiripr Falls Them HIP licmltlltiir ttlll lie Issued Im ninilliitcl Aotliliig numb of thc I Writ of Error mil ninl Itoliprtt Mill Take the Of llrri Nlllilnn Ifv Pay An opinion was rciulcred h Incite lowers In the Supremo Court this alter noon dcnjing tIme motion for i hoirlng In the ofllto nisei Nothing hu jot boui mid by the up cllnnt in regard to time writ of error for which the undo applicition in Wash itfcton so it now follows that tlio runitli tur will bo issued bj time Supremo Court mat onto and time legal officers will hake losscsfion within n few dnjn Following is time opinion a IN THP surnrME count UTAH lEimixonT rime People oi rol W II Diokson i etc vs Nenlit W Clayton and the 1coplo ox rel W 11 Diokson etc TO Jams Jack Opinion of the Court Vow BBS Jfho defendants In the above asos petition for to bearings Nothing la srgj tl nt1 i igln tt uraestcd in lImo petitions but wbat was iiily considered on the Argument Wo have iino and ncnin decided that nnoh petitions bow no ground for the allowance of re hearIngs Time petitions of tIme defendants ore therefore denied Zion C J Concurs BOBEMAN A J Concurs |