Show I THE NASTY DILKE DIVORCE Crowde1 IcI I theIlm Oivo II Ihl npul LONDON July 1Gho rehearing in tho divorce case of Crawford aRainst Crawford and Dill o ns opened by tho Queens 1roo 111 vvns begun todny fair Charles DUke the co respondent wns present ns also were Mrs Crawford and her sister Ihe rourt room wns crowded Counsel for Iho Queens proctor In openiiiR the case asserted thnt tho servants mentioned by Mrs Crawford in her confession as bciiiR present and witncssmR her meetings with Sir Charles Dilke nt his house or elsewhere did not confirm Mrs Crawford s stntemont man particular birah ASnrd who Mrs Crnwford said dressed her m bir Chnrles apartments after his depnrtnro from tho appointment t there denied I stO said that BUO ever did as Mr Crnwford alleged Iholreuch womar Crawford confessed Innu who Mrs Crawforl confossel brought her into relations with bir Chnrl leu Dilki with her husband hnd counsel admitted disappeared ImtDilko himself would testif IJ show Ihnt 1 ho was not with Mrs Crawford on with tho diles film alleges bo was in compnnj wih her nnd Iniiuj tbo woman who Kept tho ull wherein Mrs Crnw bouse in Wnrren street wherel Orw ford said sho met hir Charles would Bhon Ihnt tho respondent niver slept thero ns alleged IleJe Charles DIes eonclimuli would show I lint ho never staved long nt Mrs Crawford s house waiting for Ins master tenuinato his visits to Mrs Crawford Iho coachman would further testify that ho could have seen If anthing wrong hnd been done in Ibo room whoro I Mrs Crnwford received bir Charles m her own house as Ibe coicbman from his box could easily see over tho whole area of tho room Iho consensus of opinion makes l of tho rehearing n strong BW lrsg nt ft t0IIu whitewash Dilke Mrs Crawford Craw-ford adheres lo ovcrj statement in her con fcshion |