Show WAS GOOD ENOUGH REAS REASON accused malt MC lt lawyer asserted his clients innocence so what was there for jury to do the following story either shows ex extreme ignorance on the part of a juror or it shows ahat a wonderful charm sonic some lawyers exercise on a n jury sold said a former marshal of a southern indiana city A murder was committed and it was not long before we had bad the man mho we were sure had committed tile the deed but lie he had money find and lie retained the best lawyers the two lawyer we wilt call white and black lecause because white and black are not their real rea names the jury was made up largely of mea who ho till tilled edthe the soil they were of the honest sort white rind and black especially white so presented their clients case telling how he could not do such a horrible deed using their handkerchiefs occasionally in the telling that the jurors were carried away ant and voted for acquittal later I 1 met one of the he jurors find and I 1 said to him jones why did you vote to acquit the prisoner the evidence showed clearly that lie he was guilty no sir that man inan was not guilty said jones jonea what makes you think BO sot I 1 countered why because mr white said he be concluded jones |