Show FIED luLE TEN ADOPTER Fourt fourteen cen democrats bit arcain with president vote with republicans the most sensational news from the national capital this week is the adoption of the new article X of the league of nations covenant by the senate the vote being 56 against ag and fourteen democrats disagreeing with president wilson on the dominating issue of the peace treaty controversy tro versy voting with the republicans the vote stood for adoption republicans borah brandegee calder capper colt cummings curtis dillingham edge elkins fern aid F france rance Freling huyser gronna hale harding jones of washington kellogg kenyon keyes knox lafollette y lenroot lodge mick mclean mcnary moses new norris page phipps poindexter sherman smoot spencer sterling sutherland townsend wadsworth 1 warren I arren and watson 42 democrats ashurst gerry gore henderson kendrick myers nugent ii phelan pittman pomerene reed shields smith of georgia and walsh of massachusetts 14 total 5 56 6 against 3 no democrats Bec beckham kharn chamberlain comer culberson dial glass harris harrison hitchcock johnson of south dakota jones of new mexico I zing king kirby mckellar overman owen ransdell Raus dell robinson Robin bon she sheppard p pard simmons smith of maryland i stanley trammell trammel underwood walsh of montana Mont atin and wol cott 2 ag G total 2 26 6 the revamped article reads continued on page 8 MODIFIED J ED ARTICLE TEN ADOPTED continued from page 1 the united states assumes no obligation to preserve tho the territorial integrity or political independence 0 of any other country by the employment of its military or naval forces its resources or any form of economic discrimination or to interfere in any way in controversies between nations including all controversies relating to territorial or oi political independence pen dence whether members of the league or not under the provisions of article X or to employ y the military or naval forces of the united states under any article of the treaty for any purpose unless in any particular case congress which under i the constitution has the solo sole power to declare war or authorize the employment of the military or naval forces of 0 the united states shall in the exercise of oc full liberty of 0 action by act or joint resolution so provide by the adoption of this reservation according to general belief the effort seems to be ended for a compromise that would insure ratification and the treaty seems to be hastened toward a deadlock from which it can be released only by a verdict verdic I 1 at the polls next november |