Show I 1 s GOOD ENOUGH REASON mans hians lawyer asserted his maj clients innocence so what was there for jury to do tile the following story either cither shows extreme ignorance on the part of a juror or it shows what a wonderful charm charin sonic some lawyers exercise on a jury said a former marshal of a southern indiana city A murder was committed and it was wag not long before we hart hall the man who we were sure had ad committed the iced deed but lie he had money mon ey ind and he be retained tal ened the best lawyers the two lawyers HC e will call white and black because aliu c white and bluck black are not their reni real names the jury was made up hl largely gely of men who tilled the soil they were of the honest sort white and black especially white so presented their clients case telling how he could not do such a horrible deed using their handkerchiefs occasionally in tile the te telling lillig that the jurors were carried away find and voted for acquittal later I 1 met inet one oie of the jurors and 1 I said to him jones why aily dad you vote to acquit tile the prisoner the evidence showed showed clearly that he be was guilty no sir that man imin was not guilty said jones what makes you taink jao 0 o I 1 countered because mr white said he wf concluded bjones jones I 1 |