OCR Text |
Show um mtummu m luilui 1 1 ii yen Hi am Arguniiiitn In Hk llH llelKT Cane. At 'Ion. jll the loncludlng arguments In thu il unno of Helper City vs. Pleasunt Vul- iLVH iy Coul compmiy were made before I'SH Judge. Ilvnr) M Hayes In the federal Hl court room ut Halt Iuke City last '91 Mnudu) At the clone) or tho urgu- lUVU mentn Judgo lla)e nuggunted that hln il decision would bo later miiiuuiiiid iH He, huvvever, Indicated that he wu H satisfied from tho i vide me that tho H londltlonn at Cantle Oatu would hnvt. H tu bo npudll) remedied an the nvl- 'H dutiei nhov.id the lontrntlou or tho 1H plaintiff tn be rounded upon merit In l?l Mibntnntlal partluulam. 'IflH The court dlrectl) nlludnl to the IHH iluno proxlmlt) or manure heaps, BH drainage rrom which would reuuh the BH rivet In time ur freshets. Previous HH to hourlng the urgumentn, tho court jiflH accompunlud by Judge Peril Krloknen I HH and Attorney M P Ilraffct lust Butur- ' JHHI da) ugaln Visited Cuntlo Date mid went jflH over tho situation with ktciiI care. Tho 'fll court ex pre Shi il conimciidiitlou of Hie ill effoit luiev being mado b) the do- H feiiilunl itimpun) to avoid the pollil ,H Hon of tho I'rlei. river und Willow ( M Cretk through thi tunntiuitloii or I 1 cunnpouln und othir railitur) miusun tlH designed tu propcrl) cam for con- "Cl tnmluatlng wuter running rrom WU- i B low Criok mid other sources I H Thin tune, which hun oucuipltd ubout IH two wick In It trial U tho flrnt or a 9 hcrle or like ennen the lemulning fll ones being not ror Inuring at 'the Kob- Hl ruur) term ur tho district court. In IwSH the opinion or the attorney a deter- ifwH mlnatlon having been react or the I TlflH luvv quistlons Involved, u speedy din- iflHkteJffill ponltlou or tho pending rase seem HUSI likely HHHHSI |